Search for: "In Re: David Smith"
Results 1521 - 1540
of 1,596
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2010, 3:37 am
See also David Post at the Volokh Conspiracy, Margot Kaminski at Balkinization, and Andrew Moshirnia at Citizen Media Law Blog. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 3:50 am
Now, roughly a century later, they’re tilting right. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
David L. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 7:18 pm
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 8:30 pm
His Prior Pardons May Set the Stage for More USA Today – David Jackson, John Fritze, and Kevin Johnson | Published: 12/4/2020 As President Trump weighs granting pardons to close associates – and perhaps family members and even himself – experts said he may not pay much of a political price, no matter whom the recipients are. [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 2:15 pm
Now we’re back with more slogans and taglines from across the country – 50 of them to be exact. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm
The Sixth Circuit held as early as 2004, in Smith v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 8:25 am
” In re Ephedra Prods. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 4:30 am
")David Bowie - "I Have Not Been to Oxford" ("And the prison priests are decent / My attorney seems sincere / I fear my days are numbered / Lord, get me out of here. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
– discussion of Washington Post article on Ismed’s efforts to promote follow-on biologics approval pathway: (Patent Baristas), (Patent Docs), US: Congressional fact-finding on follow-on biologics: (Patent Docs), US: David v Monsanto: Biotechnology patent ‘exhaustion’ after Quanta, Supreme Court petition: (Hal Wegner), US: Ulysses Pharmaceuticals announces issuance of patent for novel class of ant [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 8:43 pm
[This is a version of a letter I sent to the Senate Subcommittee on Intellectual Property today to call attention to various discrepancies in the proposed witness list, especially the presence of the Pirate Party at a hearing at the world’s greatest deliberative body. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 8:29 pm
Natural Res. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
I relied in part on an anecdote involving a visit by Justice Scalia to the University of Texas and and his clear lack of interest in what his friend and former colleague Doug Laycock planned to publish in the Supreme Court Review about his opinion in the “peyote case,” Smith v. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 11:21 am
EFF Civil Liberties Director David Greene delivered the following as a keynote address on March 6, 2020, at the Media Law and Policy in the Digital Age: Global Challenges and Opportunities symposium hosted by Indiana University's Center for International Media Law and Policy Studies and its Barbara Restle Press Law Project. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 4:17 pm
DAVID L. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
National/Federal As Trump Attacks Voting by Mail, GOP Builds 2020 Strategy Around Limiting Its Expansion MSN – Amy Gardner, Shawn Boberg, and Josh Dawsey (Washington Post) | Published: 6/1/2020 President Trump’s persistent attacks on mail-in voting have fueled an unprecedented effort by conservatives to limit expansion of the practice before the November election, with tens of millions of dollars planned for lawsuits and advertising aimed at restricting who receives ballots and… [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 1:52 pm
David Vitter, R-La., and approved by a vote of 88 to 11, and second on its own, when it passed by voice vote in December. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
“You’re too honest,” Trump berated Pence as he refused to go along with the election plot, according to the indictment. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 4:00 am
Gaetz Probe Includes Scrutiny of Potential Public Corruption Tied to Medical Marijuana Industry CNN – Evan Perez, Paula Reid, Scott Glover, and David Shortell | Published: 4/23/2021 Federal authorities are investigating whether a 2018 trip to the Bahamas involving U.S. [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 4:00 am
Circuit Court of Appeals said it will not re-examine a decision that overturned many of Alaska’s most important limits on campaign contributions. [read post]
