Search for: "In re I.S." Results 1521 - 1540 of 13,484
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2018, 12:07 pm by Tom Smith
"The parents have clearly indicated that they're not open to it," i.e. giving their daughter transgender hormones. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 5:43 pm by Dan Kirkpatrick and Harry Cole
Second, the Commission has modified its policy relating to grandfathered radio clusters (i.e., those that existed before the adoption of Metro markets). [read post]
21 May 2020, 2:53 pm by Jennifer Barna
  Executive Order 147 loosens some of those restrictions, and now allows: Four players per tee time; Use of “forecaddies” (i.e., a person positioned up ahead on a golf hole whose job is to track golfers’ shots), but not caddies; Club and equipment rentals, provided that such policy requires: Rental equipment be limited to one person, excluding immediate family members, caretakers, household members, or romantic partners; and Protocols for cleaning and disinfecting… [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 3:14 am
The TTABlogger has once again chosen the ten TTAB decisions that he considers to be the most important and/or interesting from the previous calendar year (i.e., 2016). [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 7:00 am
’” In re Fat Boys Water Sports LLC, 118 U.S.P.Q.2d 1511, 1515-16 (T.T.A.B. 2016) (quoting In re Oppedahl & Larson LLP, 373 F.3d 1171, 71 U.S.P.Q.2d 1370, 1372 (Fed. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 12:35 pm by Timothy Edgar
  The Fourth Amendment protects against unreasonable searches, i.e., those without a warrant or some exception to the warrant requirement. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 1:03 pm by Brad Hokanson
The 5th Circuit Court of Appeals in the case In re McCoy, 666 F.3d 924 (5th Cir. 2012) and the 10th Circuit in the case In re Mallo, 2014 WL 7360130 (10th Cir. 2014), reviewed the above paragraph and, in particular, the term “applicable filing requirements”. [read post]
9 Jun 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
These facts clearly do not fulfil the requirements of R 136(2), in that they were not presented in the request for re-establishment of rights. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 5:07 am
  A state constitutional provision cannot trump, i.e., override, a provision of the U.S. [read post]
30 May 2011, 8:42 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Cir. 1987); and In re California Pizza Kitchen, Inc., 10 USPQ2d 1704 (TTAB 1988). [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 11:00 am
In re Gene Simmons Comics Group, Serial No. 78905279 (September 19, 2008) [not precedential].The Board applied its usual 2(e)(4) analysis, finding that SIMMONS is a "very common surname" (ranking 92nd out of some 89,000 surnames in the 1990 census data), that the name of someone (Gene Simmons) associated with Applicant has that surname, and that Simmons has the "look-and-feel" of a surname.Applicant argued that SIMMONS has a recognized meaning other than as a surname… [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 4:13 pm by Dennis Crouch
 preliminary instructions during examination (i.e., prior to allowance). [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 11:44 am
"That's aimed square at (what's left of) the middle class; those less fortunate (i.e. [read post]
31 May 2020, 6:29 pm by John Gotaskie
Provide at least six feet of distance between non-customers (i.e., people passing by on sidewalk) and customers seated at a table. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 8:37 am by Chris Kramer
Fortunately, the major credit and debit card networks (i.e. [read post]