Search for: "In re INITIATIVE PETITION NO. 2"
Results 1521 - 1540
of 1,946
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2011, 9:23 am
I just want to note that the standard adopted by the decision is not particularly pro-biological-parent.In any case, here’s part of the majority’s rationale for at least providing some protection for the parents, followed by the majority’s statement of the key facts of the case:Failure to accord the parents a presumption in favor of their decision to terminate the guardianship would penalize their initial decision that it was in the best interest of the child to enter… [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 5:10 pm
An online petition set up by Steven’s father had also accumulated over 8,000 signatures. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 9:13 am
Heightened Pleading Standards in False Marking Cases On Tuesday, the Federal Circuit granted in part a petition for writ of mandamus in In Re BP Lubricants USA Inc., Misc. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 5:22 am
Earlier this week, in In re BP Lubricants USA, Inc., ___ F.3d ___ (Fed. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 1:55 pm
In support of his petition, Mr. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 4:00 am
If the case involves a closely held New York business corporation and you're seeking judicial dissolution based on 50/50 deadlock or minority shareholder oppression, the rules laid out in Article 11 of the Business Corporation Law require you to file a "special proceeding" consisting minimally of two documents: (1) a petition and (2) an order to show cause (OSC). [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 1:16 pm
Here is Secretary of Defence Gates's statement rescinding the moratorium. 2. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 6:47 pm
(IP finance) United States US Patents – Decisions CAFC: In re Katz (part 2): Indefiniteness of computer processes (Patently-O) CAFC: Altair illustrates how to win by losing: Altair v Leddynamics (IPBiz) District Court E D Wisconsin: In Re Seagate does not dictate standard for pleading willful infringement claim: Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation, et. al. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 1:11 am
From the petition date to February 27th, revenues had exceeded projections by approximately $12,000 and costs were lower than projections by almost $104,000. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 9:43 am
Hernandez-Guerrero’s re-entry date. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 12:17 pm
In re American Express Financial Advisors Securities Litig., Civil Action No. 1-04-cv-1773 (S.D.N.Y.). [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 5:54 am
State of Utah In Re: M.G., M.G. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 9:52 am
They're just like that. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 10:10 am
Now, as shown in this Wall Street Journal article, they’re back: It’s alive! [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 11:28 pm
Initially, when the act came to force, many writ petitions were filed challenging the action initiated by the Bank under the provisions of SARFAESI Act, 2002 and even a notice under section 13 (2) of the Act was challenged before the High Court in many cases. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 11:05 am
(Similar situations come up on occasion, I think, when people are gathering initiative or referendum signatures and opponents of the initiative or referendum come up to the person and angrily argue with him or condemn him, trying to deter others from coming to sign the petition.) [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 7:57 am
Field Office Processing Dates for Vermont Service Center as of: December 31, 2010FormTitleClassification or Basis for Filing:Processing Timeframe:I-102Application for Replacement/Initial Nonimmigrant Arrival/Departure RecordInitial issuance or replacement of a Form I-942.5 MonthsI-129Petition for A Nonimmigrant WorkerBlanket L2 MonthsI-129Petition for A Nonimmigrant WorkerE - Treaty traders and investors2 MonthsI-129Petition for A Nonimmigrant WorkerH-1B - Specialty… [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 9:08 pm
”[1] A number of recent, post-Frye[2] Board decisions start with this statement, or a similar allocation of burden of proof. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 9:37 am
[N.J.S.A. 9:2-7.1a.] [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 3:36 pm
Rev & T C §62(a)(2). [read post]
