Search for: "JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF CALIFORNIA"
Results 1521 - 1540
of 1,643
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2007, 3:17 am
Why is it so hard to get private bar defense attorneys to take death cases in California? [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 10:56 am
Opinion below (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner's reply Amicus brief of the Council on State Taxation Docket: 09-277 Title: Connecticut Department of Public Utility Control v. [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 3:25 pm
Four states have eliminated or rolled back cash bail to certain degrees: California, New Jersey, New York, and Alaska. [read post]
15 Apr 2022, 4:00 am
California – Corruption Probe Ends in Ex-San Mateo County Community College District C [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 1:21 pm
While City’s staff initially believed the Gemdale project could be CEQA-exempt, it prepared an addendum concluding its impacts were adequately analyzed in and mitigated pursuant to the PEIR such that no further environmental review was required; City’s Planning Commission, and its Council on appeal, found the addendum adequate and that no subsequent or supplemental EIR was required, and approved the project. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Scotland’s Court of Session has heard arguments in a judicial review of the Scottish government’s decision against investigating purported discrepancies in Trump’s financial reporting and two golf club purchases. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 3:01 pm
This instability thus manifests itself in contests for control of regulatory space--through robust projects of legalization and judicialization of the societal sphere in general, and the obligations of enterprises specifically--or through the privatization of the legal sphere as enterprises themselves are deputized to undertake the role once reserved to states. [read post]
23 Aug 2021, 1:39 pm
Event Announcements (More details on the Events Calendar) Tuesday, August 24, 2021, at 10:00 a.m.: The Brookings Institution will host an event on how veterans can protect American democracy. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 11:40 am
The Massachusetts ballot initiative was similar to Prop 22, the California voter initiative supported by an overwhelming majority of voters but later found by a court to violate that state’s Constitution in a decision that is currently on appeal. [read post]
14 May 2015, 12:57 am
Nothing was cited to support such a far ranging proposition, whether from debate in the legislature or from subsequent judicial dicta. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
In National Pork Producers Council Ross, a fractured Court upheld the constitutionality of a California law banning the in-state sale of meat from pigs confined under certain “cruel” conditions. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 4:00 am
California – Court Upholds California’s Anti-Pay-to-Play Law Barring Votes Benefiting Campaign Contributors SiliconValley.com – Jason Henry (San Gabriel Valley Tribune) | Published: 5/26/2023 A Sacramento County Superior Court judge rejected a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of a law prohibiting elected officials from voting on matters involving the people and companies who contribute to their campaigns. [read post]
3 May 2007, 10:20 am
Standard Oil of California, 332 U.S. 301, 314 (1947). [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
National/Federal A Trump-Appointed Official Who Gets an Important Vote on Whether Trump Broke Election Laws Spoke at a Texas GOP Event Where He Was Billed as a Part of the ‘Trump Elections Team’ MSN – Madison Hall | Published: 6/30/2022 FEC member Trey Trainor, who was appointed by Donald Trump, spoke at a Republican-sponsored “election integrity” event in Texas in November 2021. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 9:06 am
One relevant difference between Missouri and many other states, and all the federal courts, is that some courts in Missouri engage in a particularly edentulous form of judicial gatekeeping of expert witness opinion testimony. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
But if the presence of consideration were necessary, a state faced with a statute that created a clear condition on federal funding alongside an arguable and in any event unclear condition would be unable, prior to the state’s having done anything to satisfy the clear condition, to obtain a judicial declaration that the unclear condition is not valid on account of its lack of clarity. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 8:44 am
., the battle over a blogger’s critical use of a person’s headshot and the ridiculous City of Inglewood claim that video recordings of its city council meetings were copyrighted. 7) Who is an employee online? [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm
For example, a small license fee for marriage licenses might deter some folks from marrying but would ordinarily not require a compelling government justification to be upheld.But as is also implicit in your remarks, when government involves itself in matters of race, judicial deference is reduced. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 8:50 am
Laborers District Council Construction Industry Pension Fund, 13-435 (ditto); North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 3:00 am
National/Federal Chris Christie Cashes in On Coronavirus Lobbying Politico – Theodoric Meyer and Adam Cancryn | Published: 7/23/2020 Former New Jersey Gov. [read post]
