Search for: "King v. King" Results 1521 - 1540 of 8,142
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2009, 9:04 am
uvenile students accused of chronically cutting classes in public schools are entitled to a lawyer in their first court hearing, a three-judge panel of the Washington state Court of Appeals ruled Monday.Reversing a King County Superior Court ruling and an earlier Court of Appeals finding that was made on different issues, the panel found that denying a juvenile the right to a lawyer from the outset violated constitutional requirements.Truants can have lawyer, state rules, The Olympian, Jan.… [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 5:25 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
To view a copy of the Appellate Term's decision, please use this link: Paris v. [read post]
28 Jun 2014, 8:31 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
King, Nancy J., Juries and Prior Convictions: Managing the Demise of the Prior Conviction Exception to Apprendi (June 1, 2014). [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 2:40 pm by Michael Ausbrook
"I guess it's the difference between Tyson's chickens and the free-range variety.United States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 10:00 pm
As a result, the presiding Kings County Supreme Court Justice granted the defendant’s request and directed that all liens be vacated and that the horses be returned.On appeal, the Appellate Division, Second Department, agreed with the court below, noting that because JBRA failed to competently show that any bonafide expenses remained outstanding, the vacatur of all liens and the direction that the animals and equipment be relinquished were affirmed.They certainly needed to stop… [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
  More information about the volume is found here.One of those cases seen more fully through the Paper Books is Marshall v. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 12:01 am by jwamiller
HistoryLink, a website dedicated to Washington State's history, has an article about Japanese American incarceration in Seattle and King County with pictures of those affected. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 1:00 pm
No one yet knows how SCOTUS will rule in King v Burntwell, but that hasn't stopped the doomsayers from claiming that a gazillion people will "lose their subsidies" should Plaintiff (King) prevail.No, they won't.That's because you can't lose something to which you were never entitled.The fact of the matter is, should SCOTUS insist that the law be applied as it was written, then folks in states using the 404Care.gov site were never eligible to… [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 5:14 pm by Mary Whisner
 As Isabel Wilkerson’s The Warmth of Other Suns did for the story of America’s black migration, Gilbert King’s Devil in the Grove does for this great untold story of American legal history, a dangerous and uncertain case from the days immediately before Brown v. [read post]
1 May 2023, 5:00 am
And, further, since her causes of action weren’t “duplicative,” and had been pleaded with sufficient particularity, the AD2 didn’t think they were subject to dismissal on that basis, either.Seems like they were all pretty discriminating there.# # #G.S. v Pitts Mgt. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 11:03 am by ernst
Frederic Morrow, between King & Ike (LC)This article considers the life and career of E. [read post]
23 Nov 2023, 10:00 pm
Corp. v Resurrection Temple of Our Lord, Inc. [read post]