Search for: "MATTER OF L R" Results 1521 - 1540 of 7,381
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2019, 10:36 am by Lev Sugarman
R Street is growing rapidly but remains a close-knit team. [read post]
3 Mar 2019, 9:01 pm by Samuel Estreicher and David Moosmann
Here, the president has determined that “it is necessary for the Armed Services to provide additional support to address the crisis” that he has declared to pose a national emergency.As an initial matter, the statute by necessity gives relatively little guidance as to whether and when a national emergency “requires use of the armed forces. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 11:27 am by Lowell Brown
The court then asked the Committee on Disciplinary Rules and Referenda, or CDRR, to study the matter. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 9:00 am by Dennis Crouch
District Court Judge Mark Walker dismissed the case on a R.12(b)(6) motion without taking any evidence — finding the asserted claims ineligible as a matter of law. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman and Grant Hayden
” She also argued as a factual matter that her transgender status was the basis for the employer’s decision to rescind the offer. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 1:49 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
She doesn’t think that’s a matter of free speech.Deutsch: all sorts of third party sites have provisions about copyright & TM etc; DMCA gives you obligations for takedown. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 5:00 am by Lev Sugarman
Mike Gallagher (R-Wis.), Jimmy Panetta (D-Calif.) and Mackenzie Eaglen. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
Justice L’Heureux-Dubé invokes his name in the Supreme Court of Canada’s R. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 8:44 pm by Sara Parrello
Sara Parrello and Fabio AngeliniIs being environmentally friendly a quality which matters for consumers? [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:44 pm by admin
INTRODUCTION On September 28, 2004, the United States Supreme Court granted a property owner’s application for leave from a Connecticut Supreme Court decision upholding the constitutionality of the community’s taking of property with the specified purpose of creating jobs by selling the property to a private industrial user.1 As the petitioner land owners in Kelo express in their brief requesting leave, the critical question for the Court to determine is whether a taking for purely… [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm by admin
Crane, 50 Mich 182, 15 NW 73 (1883); Grand Rapids, etc R Co v Cheseboro, 74 Mich 466; 42 NW 66 (1889); Union Depot Co v Backus, 92 Mich 34; 52 NW 790 (1892). [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 10:32 am by admin
New York,3 that the Supreme Court matter-of-factly held that the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment was “of course” applicable to the states.4 To justify incorporation, Penn Central cited only one 19th century case, which itself did not mention the Fifth Amendment.5 Before Penn Central, the Court relied on the Due Process Clause to restrict the scope of state taking power. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 5:45 am
WaPo's argument might be that there are a lot of colorful characterizations that get expressed, but they're not really falsehoods in the sense that ought to matter. [read post]