Search for: "MATTER OF RULES OF EVIDENCE"
Results 1521 - 1540
of 42,191
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Dec 2022, 10:48 am
Thus, the court affirmed the trial court ruling. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 9:47 am
The trial court ruled against Sabey and he took the matter up on appeal where he obtained a reversal of the judgment. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 10:17 am
Would it make sense in a country that requires “due process of the law” to refuse consideration of the new evidence, no matter how strong? [read post]
4 Sep 2017, 9:01 pm
” The National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), which rules on these matters, has preliminarily approved the request in its entirety. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 10:10 am
The Rules of Evidence allow impeachment by conviction of a crime under Rule 609, but nothing in the rules speaks to impeachment by evidence of pending charges specifically. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 5:24 am
In an August 7, 2013 ruling, Judge Jed S. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 4:00 am
The Appellate Division, noting that "[as] a general rule, apportionment is not applicable as a matter of law where the preexisting condition was not the result of a compensable injury and the claimant was able to effectively perform his or her job duties at the time of the work-related accident despite the preexisting condition," indicated that a limited exception to this general rule exists. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 4:00 am
The Appellate Division, noting that "[as] a general rule, apportionment is not applicable as a matter of law where the preexisting condition was not the result of a compensable injury and the claimant was able to effectively perform his or her job duties at the time of the work-related accident despite the preexisting condition," indicated that a limited exception to this general rule exists. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 4:00 am
The Appellate Division, noting that "[as] a general rule, apportionment is not applicable as a matter of law where the preexisting condition was not the result of a compensable injury and the claimant was able to effectively perform his or her job duties at the time of the work-related accident despite the preexisting condition," indicated that a limited exception to this general rule exists. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 4:00 am
The Appellate Division, noting that "[as] a general rule, apportionment is not applicable as a matter of law where the preexisting condition was not the result of a compensable injury and the claimant was able to effectively perform his or her job duties at the time of the work-related accident despite the preexisting condition," indicated that a limited exception to this general rule exists. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 6:35 pm
Federal Rule of Evidence 702. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 4:51 pm
The Probate Court ruled in Emilia’s favor in 2000, granting Thomas’s motion for summary judgment and ordering Anna to pay Emilia the amount she had already collected from Kuznar’s pension fund. [read post]
8 May 2023, 4:01 am
The relatively small number of reported § 1118 cases in which courts have departed from the 9% statutory rate include Giaimo v Vitale (4%), Matter of Whalen (4%), Matter of Bambu Sales, Inc. (5.75%), and Matter of Fleischer (12%) — none of which explained how the court arrived at the chosen rate. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 12:33 pm
., A-2688-09T1, February 9, 2011: A motion for reconsideration is governed by Rule 4:49-2 and is a matter to be exercised in the trial court’s sound discretion. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 2:00 am
However, this should be done prior to the close of pleadings because once the matter is set down for trial, Rule 48.04(1) applies. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 5:51 am
But in the presence of transaction costs, the initial allocation of rights does matter. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 3:46 pm
NRS 128.005(1) and (2); Matter of Parental Rights as to D.R.H., 120 Nev. 422, 426-27, 92 P.3d 1230, 1233 (2004); Matter of Parental Rights as to C.J.M., 118 Nev. 724, 732, 58 P.3d 188, 194 (2002). [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 3:15 am
The CAFC concluded that substantial evidence supported the Board's findings and the Board did not err in concluding that the applied-for mark comprises immoral or scandalous matter. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 7:13 am
The General Principle: Your Rights Are the Same No Matter Who Files First Filing for divorce would only affect the proceedings if the courts took fault into account when ruling over alimony and property division matters. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 12:26 pm
For example, it is not a matter of controversy that Mr. [read post]
