Search for: "MAY v. USA" Results 1521 - 1540 of 5,345
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jul 2012, 6:39 pm
Many other Bishops may not be aware of it just now, but they are going to face plenty of storms in their own dioceses after they return.This is not like General Convention 2003, when people had to read the news about the confirmation of V. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 2:40 pm
The court noted at the outset of its analysis the general standard for service in New York, adopted from Mullane v. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 4:34 am by Edith Roberts
” At The George Washington Law Review’s On the Docket blog, Shannon Rohn discusses the court’s recent decision in in Endrew F. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 6:53 am by Amy Howe
Bill Crawford, the petitioner in Crawford v. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 6:38 am by Adam Chandler
” Peter Scheer of the First Amendment Coalition writes in the Huffington Post that “Citizens United may be the most consequential First Amendment decision—in terms of expanding free speech rights—since New York Times v. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 4:16 am by Edith Roberts
” At Stanford Law School’s Legal Aggregate blog, William Koski discusses Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia v. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 8:09 am
 As discussed here, if considered satire, not parody, Dumb Starbucks could be liable for infringement (Dr Seuss Enterprises v Penguin Books USA (1997)).It seems unlikely that adding DUMB- provides enough distinction for it to avoid being considered an unauthorised derivative of Starbucks’ copyrighted works. [read post]
31 May 2023, 2:55 am
June 27, 2023 - 11 AM: LogMeIn, Inc. and GoTo Technologies USA, Inc. v. [read post]