Search for: "Marks v. United States"
Results 1521 - 1540
of 9,179
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2018, 8:16 am
…It is of course undisputed that plaintiff sold space to Google, but that alone is insufficient to establish that plaintiff used the Klumba mark in United States commerce. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 2:30 pm
The same Ms Swift has been working hard to secure trade mark protection in the United States for elements of her song lyrics, such as the vivid imagery of "this sick beat" and the rather more prosaic "we never go out of style". [read post]
4 Jan 2008, 9:14 pm
No one has been executed in the United States for a crime other than murder since 1964. [read post]
4 May 2011, 11:13 am
v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 2:42 pm
United States, 278F.3d 641, 643 (6th Cir. 2002); Schubert v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 8:32 am
Hetronic International Inc., the Supreme Court held that the Lanham Act does not reach trademark infringement that occurs outside of the United States (US). [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 8:22 am
" Registration also enables the trademark holder "to stop the importation into the United States of articles bearing an infringing mark. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 6:45 am
In Trinity Lutheran Church v. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 4:05 am
Green, Moral Reality as a Guide to Original Meaning: In Defense of United States v. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 9:45 pm
United States v. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 7:24 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Oct 2024, 3:46 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 9:00 pm
Mark, 425 F.3d 505, 508-11 (8th Cir. 2005); Holm, 326 F.3d at 877-78; United States v. [read post]
31 May 2022, 3:26 am
Moreover, there was no evidence of third-party use of a CREEL-formative mark in connection with legal services in the U.S.The record shows that the CREEL mark has been used by Applicant substantially exclusively and continuously in commerce with the United States in connection with legal services for at least 10 years, and there is additional evidence discussed above that Applicant has achieved recognition by United States law firms and clients… [read post]
24 Mar 2007, 5:34 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 5:20 am
NARA v. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 2:40 pm
This morning the Court granted review in United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 3:23 pm
See Midwest Plastic Fabricators, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 7:27 am
In United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 12:08 pm
Much like the fact that almost 150 years after the ratification of the 13th Amendment the United States still struggles to annihilate human trafficking and slavery within its borders, most Americans are unaware of the history of eugenics and forced sterilization in the United States. [read post]
