Search for: "Paras v. State"
Results 1521 - 1540
of 6,181
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2019, 8:20 am
Part V assesses how NLHs and their host states affect each other, including hubs’ positive spillover effects and host state pushback. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 6:12 am
In Democratic Republic of the Congo v. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 7:19 pm
This was certainly the stated view of Mrs Stocker after court. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 10:58 am
Esta semana se celebró una segunda vista pública presidida por el representante Víctor Parés Otero, presidente de la Comisión de Desarrollo Económico, Planificación, Telecomunicaciones, Alianzas Público Privadas y Energía, en torno a la Resolución de la Cámara 1219, que busca ampliar la investigación referente al uso de generadores eléctricos y combustible provisto por Federal Emergency Management… [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 6:27 am
¶ 47.) [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 6:50 am
In Barrick Gold Corp. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 4:16 am
In fact, the contract between Montag Architects and the nonparty developers specifically excludes the creation of a contractual relationship with third parties (see Dormitory Auth. of the State of N.Y. v Samson Constr. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 12:45 pm
Compl. 47-48 ¶ 227, ECF No. 197 (District refuses to warn about granting opposite sex access generally, or upon actual entry to a privacy facility.). [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 12:45 pm
Compl. 47-48 ¶ 227, ECF No. 197 (District refuses to warn about granting opposite sex access generally, or upon actual entry to a privacy facility.). [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 8:28 am
Inst. of Tech. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 2:57 pm
” The Court cited as similar the case of Citizens for Open Government v. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 1:05 pm
It provides a shield for individuals from arbitrary state action. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 8:09 am
”) Lord Kerr, like Stephens J at first instance, noted that that was not an immutable requirement as the ECtHR had stated in Mocanu v Romania (10865/09) (2015) 60 EHRR 19 (Paras 107-108 of Lord Kerr’s judgment) and as the Supreme Court had found in McCaughey’s case (See paras 118, 119 and, in particular, 139 of McCaughey’s case). [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 8:08 am
” (Quoted in para 44 (v) of Lord Kerr’s judgment) In the event a decision was made on 11 July 2011 that a public inquiry would not be conducted. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 5:20 am
, Chandler v Cape plc [2012] EWCA Civ 525.Tort, however, can be understood in two senses here. [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 7:47 pm
In R v Belnavis the Supreme Court stated that “the reasons for this principle of deference are apparent and compelling. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 8:14 am
It is perfectly in line with the law of Canada for the past 20+ years, as articulated by the Supreme Court of Canada in Eldridge v. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 1:44 pm
In this case, the Court found that the designs at issue were specific expressions of a certain seal image, thus they are a fixed expression, even if the method of creation belongs to the public domain.Furthermore, the Court found that Pyrrha's jewellery was original because it fulfilled the following three elements (CCH Canadian Ltd v Law Society of Upper Canada, 2004 SCC 13 at para 16, [2004] 1 SCR 339, para 28): (i) the work originated from the author;… [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 9:36 am
MANU/SC/0439/1986, Para 89; SK Jain v Haryana MANU/SC/0323/2009; General Assurance Society Ltd. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 8:15 am
A second opinion concluded that Y was in a vegetative state and that there was no prospect of improvement. [read post]
