Search for: "People v Fell" Results 1521 - 1540 of 2,576
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Mar 2014, 6:14 am
” By nightfall, most people had barred their doors, shuttered their windows, and gone to bed. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 3:23 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The People argued extensively that the statute must be read expansively because defendants intended to rob narcotics dealers, their conduct fell within the ambit of the statute on drug crimes. [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 10:36 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Attempts to give certainty—but sometimes what you think is a clear definition becomes more complex, as in Apple v. [read post]
However, net migration from outside the EU fell from 269,000 to 244,000 in the same period and is now at the lowest level since 1998. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 5:45 am by Florian Mueller
Four years ago people advocating the abolition of software patents made a lot of noise, including a movie named Patent Absurdity, about a case pending then before the Supreme Court of the United States: Bilski v. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 11:36 am by Kevin
If an insect also featured in this new case, I don't think the Courthouse News people would have failed to mention it, but there's always hope. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
It doesn’t make the stop unlawful if there is a subsidiary purpose – “killing two birds with one stone” – but the permitted purpose must be the “true and dominant purpose behind the act” (R v Southwark Crown Court ex p. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 5:30 am
Did you know that most people are legally and lawfully eligible to be tax exempt? [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 2:56 pm by familoo
But magistrates are still prone to adopting large chunks of other people’s documents wholesale – guardian’s report, case summary, whatever. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 2:19 pm
In the end, a claim of ineffectiveness is ultimately concerned with the fairness of the process as a whole rather than its particular impact on the outcome of the DUI case as held in People v Benevento and People v Prescod. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 3:07 pm
It cautioned against relying on evidence of people's reactions after that date when the series had been extremely successful. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 2:14 pm
But meaningful representation does not require perfection as held in People v Ford and People v Anderson. [read post]