Search for: "ROGERS v. STATE"
Results 1521 - 1540
of 3,088
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Nov 2023, 5:01 am
See Roe v. [read post]
10 Jan 2025, 4:12 pm
In 2021, a federal judge in San Diego, Roger Benitez, ruled that the state’s ban was unconstitutional, calling it a “failed experiment. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 1:27 pm
LTTB v. [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 4:03 pm
In Dred Scott v. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 11:18 am
The late Roger Traynor and his colleagues on the California Supreme Court, who presaged strict product liability way back in 1944 in Escola v. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 5:49 am
Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2015, 8:37 am
Kevin York v. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 6:25 am
(Note: the Parks Institute initially brought federal claims, but dismissed them, presumably to avoid any leakage of the entirely appropriate Rogers analysis that dooms any federal claims onto the state law publicity claims.) [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 12:27 am
The Epic Games v. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 2:56 am
Sullivan Ohio State Law Journal, Forthcoming, Roger Williams Univ. [read post]
13 May 2007, 6:01 pm
The big news tomorrow today is going to be oral argument scheduled before the Supreme Court in Elizabeth Kerrigan et al. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 6:43 am
United States v. [read post]
10 May 2015, 1:53 pm
[v] http://history.house.gov/People/Listing/R/RANKIN,-Jeannette-%28R000055%29/[vi] Walter Cronkite, NPR. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 5:15 pm
State of Indiana Roger L. [read post]
5 Sep 2020, 12:36 am
Early last week, Epic Games lost the first round of its #FreeFortnite battle against Apple when Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California denied the Fortnite maker's motion for a temporary restraining order (TRO) with respect to the company's flagship game. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 10:20 am
This was the subject of an interim decision of Roth J. earlier this month in the Competition Appeal Tribunal: Secretary of State for Health and Others v Servier Laboratories Limited and Others [2017] EWHC 2006 (Ch) -- IPKat's Eibhlin Vardy has made a detailed summary for you.And the weekly routine, Around the IP blogs! [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 4:00 am
However, said the Appellate Division, "even a long and previously unblemished record does not foreclose dismissal from being considered as an appropriate sanction" for demonstrated misconduct,” citing Matter of Rogers v Sherburne-Earlville Cent. [read post]
3 May 2019, 10:14 am
Rogers College of Law, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZModerator:Joel Kurtzberg – Partner, Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP, New York, NYWhile the United States Supreme Court’s recent decision in National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 10:13 am
Dankovich v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 10:40 am
Rogers, which was announced by Justice Breyer. [read post]
