Search for: "STAND et al. v. STATE."
Results 1521 - 1540
of 2,195
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2014, 4:33 pm
State v. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 11:22 pm
Here are the two documents (followed by further commentary):Dante deMartini et al. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 11:57 am
Publicis Group SA, et al, 2012 U.S. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 12:02 pm
Supreme Court’s 2011 term, saw a surprising and important decision handed down in National Federation of Independent Business et al. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 6:58 am
[1] CV-19-00631637-0000, Sophia Mathur, et al v Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario [2] Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, www.ipcc.ch. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 9:15 am
Cleary, et al., eds., McCormick on Evidence § 209, at 646 & n.1 (3d ed. 1984)( “In and of itself, statistical analysis can never prove that some factor A causes some outcome B. [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 2:12 pm
” In a case of continuing interest, on October 19, 2012, counsel for Plaintiffs and Appellants Berkeley Hillside Preservation, et al., submitted their oversized 106-page Answer Brief on the Merits in the California Supreme Court. [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 2:12 pm
In a case of continuing interest, on October 19, 2012, counsel for Plaintiffs and Appellants Berkeley Hillside Preservation, et al., submitted their oversized 106-page Answer Brief on the Merits in the California Supreme Court. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 4:00 pm
Glass et al 2020 ONCA 833. [read post]
19 Sep 2007, 5:50 pm
Government of the Yukon Territory, et al., 2006 YKSC 45 Tan v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 2:29 pm
Bennett, et al. (10-238) and McComish, et al., v. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 10:45 pm
Lenovo International, et. al. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 8:00 am
Advocate Health and Hospitals, et al., 2020 IL App (1st) 191638-U (Oct. 21, 2020). [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 8:49 pm
The Prop 8 backers’ appeal is Perry, et al., v. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 5:34 pm
Chad Wolf et al. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 7:47 am
Bank National Association v Langner, 168 AD3d 1021 [2d Dept 2019])” The Court observed that CPLR § 2309 sets forth the way oaths and affirmations are to be administered and notes in section (c) regarding oaths and affirmations taken without the state: An oath or affirmation taken without the state shall be treated as if taken within the state if it is accompanied by such certificate or certificates as would be required to entitle a deed acknowledged… [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 3:30 pm
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit would decide Texas v. [read post]
17 Nov 2019, 6:55 am
Getting tough on standing in ADA cases Chamaidan v. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 5:51 pm
Stephen Harlow, et al. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 5:08 pm
Several state Attorneys General challenged the new regulation in New York et al v. [read post]
