Search for: "State v. Branch"
Results 1521 - 1540
of 6,963
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2018, 4:14 am
Corp. v Dormitory Auth. of State of N.Y. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 1:01 am
” On June 26, 2013, The Supreme Court, in United States v. [read post]
12 Nov 2016, 6:41 am
A Western District, San Antonio Division opinion styled, Erika Sanchez v. [read post]
11 Apr 2007, 2:24 pm
"); Connecticut v. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 10:02 am
Feinberg v. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 2:03 pm
So, understandably, some people believe that states could limit the agenda of an Article V convention. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 3:11 am
In Simpson v Alter ;2010 NY Slip Op 08089 ;Decided on November 9, 2010 ;Appellate Division, Second Department the Court answers this question: "The Supreme Court also properly denied that branch of the appellants' motion which was to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against them pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7). [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 1:49 am
In Simpson v Alter ;2010 NY Slip Op 08089 ;Decided on November 9, 2010 ;Appellate Division, Second Department the Court answers this question: "The Supreme Court also properly denied that branch of the appellants' motion which was to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against them pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7). [read post]
24 Apr 2025, 10:33 am
[Cooper v. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 8:14 am
By Eric SegallIn the iconic case Marbury v. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am
In Donohue v Cuomo, 2022 NY Slip Op 00910, the New York State's Court of Appeals said:"In Kolbe v Tibbetts, [it] left open whether a New York court should infer vesting of retiree health insurance rights when construing a collective bargaining agreement* (CBA) (see 22 NY3d 344, 354 [2013]). [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am
In Donohue v Cuomo, 2022 NY Slip Op 00910, the New York State's Court of Appeals said:"In Kolbe v Tibbetts, [it] left open whether a New York court should infer vesting of retiree health insurance rights when construing a collective bargaining agreement* (CBA) (see 22 NY3d 344, 354 [2013]). [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 4:36 pm
The Claimant relied on the CJEU decision in Weltimmo sro v Newzeti Adatvedelmi es Informacioszabadsag Hatosag [2016] 1 WLR 863, in particular that: (1) the absence of a branch or subsidiary was not the determining factor, (2) the test for “establishment” would be satisfied if there was “any real and effective activity – even a minimal one – exercised through stable arrangements” (para 31), and (3) “both the degree of stability of the… [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 10:33 pm
Saxbe Designated Professor of Law, Moritz College of Law, The Ohio State University Tom Cochran, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Middle District of North Carolina (Attorney for [sic] Vincent Rita, Rita v. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 7:01 am
One illuminating example of this behavior came last year in the oral argument in Gill v. [read post]
24 Dec 2011, 2:58 pm
“The term ‘United States’ in § 2241(e)(2) refers to the Executive Branch, not the Judicial Branch,” Judge Leon stated, “[t]hus, the determinations of the two separate CSRTs . . . more than satisfy the statutory requirements. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 10:38 am
Tim Towarak (Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act – Subsistence Rights) State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2016state.htmlKitras v. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 2:35 pm
., v. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 7:45 am
Briefly: At The Oklahoman (via How Appealing), Chris Casteel reports that in a brief filed last week in McGirt v. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 5:40 am
Most are now familiar with the NMCCA decision in United States v. [read post]
