Search for: "State v. Little"
Results 1521 - 1540
of 24,250
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2017, 2:03 pm
Even though the 4th Amendment to the United States Constitution protects the right of the people from unreasonable searches and seizures, people still get pulled over with little justification. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 3:04 pm
Howard v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 3:08 am
The Court’s pending case in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 4:49 pm
U.S. ex rel Escobar. 5:13 p.m.: Rory Little previewed next week’s arguments in Dietz v. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 6:50 am
The following is an excerpt from Bormes v. [read post]
22 Jan 2017, 12:01 am
On January 22, 1973, Roe v. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 5:03 am
At her punishment trial for murder the State introduced evidence that the victim had at one time raised a family and served in the state guard in Minnesota, but he'd developed a problem with alcohol that had become worse over the years. [read post]
26 Nov 2022, 6:52 am
” Light v. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 12:23 pm
The state planted another defendant in his cell as a "human listening device," even though Ventris’ right to counsel had attached. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 12:38 pm
A little more than a year ago, we blogged on the reported Appellate Division Case, Tannen v. [read post]
5 May 2011, 9:00 am
Article 10 provides that all documents submitted by the Requesting State shall be translated into the language of the Requested State. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 6:57 am
The Court ruled in State v. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 10:02 am
Drug trafficking cases are nothing new here in Orlando, but the case of State v. [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 8:26 pm
I’m going back in time a little bit to pick up on an unreported September 5, 2007 decision by a New York state trial court in the case of Whitnum v. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 9:50 am
For those who are interested, the seminal case is Little v. [read post]
11 Sep 2006, 5:19 pm
The complaints--both Judge Posner's and Doug's--caught my interest, because of United States v. [read post]
23 Nov 2017, 3:44 am
Perhaps surprisingly, the Court unequivocally departs from its decision in R (Kaiyam) v Secretary of State for Justice [2014] UKSC 66 (decided less than three years earlier) to endorse the narrower understanding of the obligation set down by the ECtHR in James v UK (App no. 25119/09). [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 7:48 am
State v. [read post]
22 Nov 2006, 3:56 am
By granting review in yet another state sentencing case, California v. [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 7:22 am
"Those credentials struck Judge Angel as a little thin. [read post]
