Search for: "State v. M. C. M." Results 1521 - 1540 of 6,590
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Mar 2020, 2:09 am by JR Chaves
El incidente que comentamos, del sujeto que se alza en dueño de la vía pública, se salda con 360 euros, dándose la curiosa paradoja de las vías de castigo frente a quienes no respetan las prohibiciones: La vía penal, reservada para las conductas mas graves, comporta la condena con celeridad (al día siguiente) y supone multas desde 100 euros hasta pena de tres meses de cárcel (desobediencia) y que en el… [read post]
7 May 2018, 11:02 pm by Gordon Firemark
On April 30, 2018, California Supreme Court rendered its decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 6:47 pm
Felicito a Cuba por su presidencia exitosa del G-77 y le agradezco la cálida bienvenida y la hospitalidad que me ha brindado. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 7:49 am
" From the sidebar descriptions of cases: Peruta v. [read post]
6 Sep 2021, 11:52 am by Eric Goldman
Then again, I’m skeptical that Twitter didn’t, so let’s see the full set of facts. [read post]
23 Oct 2006, 2:18 pm
It is thus necessary to establish, - first, that there is an agreement between undertakings, a concerted practice or a decision of an association of undertakings; - second, that that agreement, concerted practice or decision has as its object or effect the restriction of competition to an appreciable extent; - and, third, that trade between member States must be capable of being affected, the purpose of that last requirement being solely to determine the application of Community law… [read post]