Search for: "State v. Walters" Results 1521 - 1540 of 1,611
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Nov 2015, 9:45 am by Bill Otis
  Many use corporal punishment as an alternative to prison, including the Islamic world, which has a collective population five times that of the Untied States. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 2:53 pm by Thorsten Bausch (Hoffmann Eitle)
Romania will become 18th member state in September. [read post]
23 Oct 2007, 7:04 am
  While this may seem unjust, courts have also upheld the franchise tag as a valid practice. [25]  Linebacker Wilbur Marshall challenged the validity by filing memorandum in federal court, where the designation was deemed fair and reasonable - the court stated that market conditions still favored players. [26]  Seeing that the franchise tag is a valid practice, the players will have to seek a forum other than the courts to address their issue with the designation.… [read post]
But if a court can determine that an offer is not FRAND, it presumably could also state wh [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 4:04 pm by David Lat
Of the 1,400 people who have voted thus far in our reader poll, only 34 percent would vote “guilty” if they were jurors in the case of State v. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm by The Regulatory Review
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Endrew F. v. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm by The Regulatory Review
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Endrew F. v. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 10:01 pm by Randy Barnett
Walter Dellinger, a former acting solicitor general under President Bill Clinton, made a compelling case for the law’s constitutionality. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 9:51 am
Scruggs, you have heard the United States Attorney state what evidence he could present against you on this particular charge if the case were to go to trial. [read post]
17 May 2007, 4:49 pm
"Now, imagine you are the CEO or General Counsel of a telcom company that has been assisting the NSA in electronic surveillance for two years, assured that what appear to be your violations of FISA do not subject you to legal exposure because you have been relying on the certification "by the Attorney General of the United States that no warrant or court order is required by law. [read post]