Search for: "State v. Word"
Results 1521 - 1540
of 40,639
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2023, 2:02 pm
From Doe v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 9:54 am
The Court of Appeal stated that consumer surveys would have provided more direct evidence, but none were provided. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 7:57 am
Benjamin Franklin 1Stanz v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 6:41 am
Longarzo * DMCA’s Unhelpful 512(f) Preempts Helpful State Law Claims–Stevens v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 6:05 am
” Kansas v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:50 am
Harrow v. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 8:21 pm
State v. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 3:07 pm
Harrell v. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 2:05 pm
—Mark Twain 1Theodore v. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 1:08 pm
” City of Troy v. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 10:46 am
Wallace (1939), and United States v. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 10:07 am
Res. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
However, said the court, citing Matter of Park v DiNapoli, 123 AD3d 1392; Matter of Walters v DiNapoli, 82 AD3d 1487; and Matter of Rivera v DiNapoli, 78 AD3d 1295, "the issue distills to whether the Retirement System successfully rebutted the heart presumption, which, in turn, required the Retirement System to demonstrate -- through expert medical proof -- that Petitioner's cardiac condition was caused by risk factors other than his employment". [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
However, said the court, citing Matter of Park v DiNapoli, 123 AD3d 1392; Matter of Walters v DiNapoli, 82 AD3d 1487; and Matter of Rivera v DiNapoli, 78 AD3d 1295, "the issue distills to whether the Retirement System successfully rebutted the heart presumption, which, in turn, required the Retirement System to demonstrate -- through expert medical proof -- that Petitioner's cardiac condition was caused by risk factors other than his employment". [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 10:41 am
Chada and Bowsher v. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 7:27 am
And Gundy v. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
., Inc. v New York State Public Empl. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
., Inc. v New York State Public Empl. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
Them,” reframe this a case of “Us v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 1:55 pm
Supreme Court ruling from Michigan v. [read post]