Search for: "UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE"
Results 1521 - 1540
of 6,104
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2019, 4:00 am
As recently as a decade ago,[i] China’s patent office, SIPO, which serves a country with three times the population of the United States, processed less than half as many patent applications as the USPTO, America’s patent and trademark… McElroy Law BlogTech and Privacy: Protecting Against Unreasonable Search and Seizure In 2017, I spoke at a conference put on by SERENE-RISC, an organization that works on issues of… [read post]
1 Dec 2019, 9:15 am
Ct. 2347 (2014), the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has increased its focus on patent eligibility. [read post]
1 Dec 2019, 9:15 am
Ct. 2347 (2014), the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has increased its focus on patent eligibility. [read post]
1 Dec 2019, 8:46 am
The United States Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of California charged Levandowski with 33 counts of theft and attempted theft of trade secrets from Google under 18 U.S.C. [read post]
30 Nov 2019, 12:49 pm
A trademark is one of your business’s most valuable assets, and if you engage in e-commerce transactions beyond your state’s borders, it is important to register your trademark with the United States Patent and Trademark Office, which enforces your rights as a trademark holder across the entire country, not just the state in which your business is located. [read post]
28 Nov 2019, 7:15 am
Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), and there remain many reasons to be hopeful about the year ahead. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 4:15 am
On October 30, the Senate Judiciary Committee’s Subcommittee on Intellectual Property heard from five witnesses on ways to improve patent quality at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 4:15 am
On October 30, the Senate Judiciary Committee’s Subcommittee on Intellectual Property heard from five witnesses on ways to improve patent quality at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 4:13 am
Your mark will appear in the online database of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”). [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 4:50 pm
United States Patent &Trademark Office, No. 18-CV-00307, 2018 WL 5929631(E.D. [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 4:15 am
Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 4:15 am
Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 2:15 pm
For weeks now I have been asking the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) to confirm how many Administrative Patent Judges (APJs) are currently employed by the Office, a request that predates the Federal Circuit’s controversial Arthrex decision, but which was renewed after the decision issued. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 2:15 pm
For weeks now I have been asking the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) to confirm how many Administrative Patent Judges (APJs) are currently employed by the Office, a request that predates the Federal Circuit’s controversial Arthrex decision, but which was renewed after the decision issued. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 1:32 pm
Register here 2020 US Patent and Trademark Office National Patent Drafting Competition, Online Event # 77918334837. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 1:24 pm
” The “ ‘solicitations’ are constructed to [deceptively] make the trademark applicant believe that an official U.S. government agency or the [United States Patent & Trademark Office (“USPTO”) ] itself is sending a letter to them, raising fear among the unsuspecting public that they must pay large amounts of money or forfeit trademark rights. [read post]
17 Nov 2019, 9:02 pm
Patent and Trademark Office; and Abby K. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 10:00 pm
Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 11:14 am
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) published a notice in the Federal Register last month saying it’s seeking comments, as spotted by TorrentFreak. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 8:50 am
This is an issue of exceptional importance, and we conclude it is an appropriate useof our discretion to decide the issue over a challenge ofwaiver.The big issue:The issue, therefore, iswhether APJs are “Officers of the United States” and if so,whether they are inferior officers or principal officers; thelatter requiring appointment by the President as opposedto the Secretary of Commerce. [read post]
