Search for: "United States Solicitor General" Results 1521 - 1540 of 4,870
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2018, 6:35 pm by Amy Howe
Feigin, assistant to the solicitor general (Art Lien) But the justices did not seem satisfied with this rule either. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 6:11 pm by Lara Fowler
Edwin Kneedler, deputy solicitor general, argued on behalf of the United States as an amicus. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 2:38 pm by Mark Walsh
” Trevor Cox, the acting solicitor general of Virginia defending the search, agrees so far. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 11:22 am by Elizabeth A. Patton
” Following the parties’ respective briefing as to whether the Supreme Court should grant certiorari and thus review the case, the Supreme Court has now invited the United States Solicitor General to submit a brief as well. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 9:41 am by Ryke Longest
Scott Keller, the solicitor general of Texas, followed to argue in support of the United States’ position. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 4:32 am by Edith Roberts
Yesterday the court issued orders from its conference of January 5; they released a summary opinion and asked for the views of the solicitor general in three cases. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 8:53 am by Schachtman
The trial court denied the petition,3 and in a non-precedential opinion [sic], the Ninth Circuit affirmed the denial of coram nobis.4 United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 8:43 am by Amy Howe
” The justices asked the U.S. solicitor general to file briefs expressing the views of the United States in three cases: Dawson v. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 2:57 pm by Benjamin Wittes
I represent the United States. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 7:43 am by Brooke Wahlberg
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit partially reversed and remanded a decision by the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii, delaying if not derailing an expansion in shallow-set longline swordfish fisheries. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 9:03 am by Ryke Longest
The solicitor general will argue that the special master erred by failing to recognize the federal interest arising under the compact, most importantly the federal government’s obligations under treaties with Mexico to deliver water. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 4:28 am by Edith Roberts
Securities and Exchange Commission, which asks whether SEC administrative law judges are “officers of the United States” within the meaning of the appointments clause and in which the government has “switch[ed] its longstanding legal position”; he enumerates several ways in which he suggests that the solicitor general “has starkly deviated from the traditional practices of the Office. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 3:12 am by Marty Lederman
  The traditional understanding is that the core of the Solicitor General’s responsibility is, in the words of former SG Seth Waxman, “to ascertain and represent the interests of the United States in litigation. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 3:12 am by Marty Lederman
  The traditional understanding is that the core of the Solicitor General’s responsibility is, in the words of former SG Seth Waxman, “to ascertain and represent the interests of the United States in litigation. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 9:00 am by Stephen Wermiel
United States, Gorsuch defended the court’s decision to send a case back to the U.S. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 9:30 am by Josh Blackman
Pursuant to this proclamation, the Attorney General promulgated the regulations that denied Knauff’s entry into the United States. [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 10:55 am by Xavier Becerra and Aimee Feinberg
Aimee Feinberg is a deputy solicitor general in the California Department of Justice. [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 4:25 am by Edith Roberts
” At Balkinization, Marty Lederman unpacks the solicitor general’s recent brief requesting a stay of a lower-court order that required a pregnant teenager to be released from immigration custody in order to obtain an abortion. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 10:36 am by Marty Lederman
  The Solicitor General of the United States actually represented to the Supreme Court that Judge Chutkan had "ordered the government to immediately facilitate an elective abortion"--even though, as I have explained repeatedly (and as I'll explain again below), the order obviously did no such thing--and that the government's "significant interest in ensuring that it does not affirmatively facilitate an abortion"… [read post]