Search for: "United States v. Burden"
Results 1521 - 1540
of 9,838
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jul 2014, 10:12 am
Under the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Quill Corp. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 12:53 pm
Perhaps nothing at all, says this Court....Houston Public Media reports on the decision.Then in the other challenge to the Texas law, United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 9:30 am
"The federal court's March 31 decision in the case of U.S. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 9:27 pm
Amon in United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 2:51 pm
CAAF has issued its opinion in United States v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 5:58 am
Michigan, came from the United States Supreme Court in the early 1990’s. [read post]
14 May 2020, 4:00 am
Petitioner had appealed the decision and order of the United States District Court dismissing his claims brought under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. [read post]
14 May 2020, 4:00 am
Petitioner had appealed the decision and order of the United States District Court dismissing his claims brought under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 12:20 am
In Sutton v. [read post]
25 May 2020, 7:37 am
In South Bay United Pentecostal Church v. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 5:25 am
The United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in Florida v. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 3:45 pm
" The opinion in State of Washington v. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 5:00 am
Appellate Courts differ regarding the State’s reduction of its employer contribution towards health insurance premiums for certain State retireesBransten v State of New York, 117 AD3d 455 Retired Pub. [read post]
30 May 2012, 6:17 am
Motiva LLC v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 3:01 pm
See United States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 11:31 am
” (slip op. at 23-24) (citing Strickland and United States v. [read post]
1 Nov 2008, 11:11 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 4:39 pm
United States—a case raising crucial questions of religious freedom law and, most importantly, statutory interpretation. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 1:52 am
The New York Court of Appeals unanimously held that the Legislature could permissibly regulate the Fund in this manner under the Contracts Clause, the Takings Clause, and the Due Process Clause of the United States Constitution. [read post]