Search for: "United States v. Kennedy" Results 1521 - 1540 of 4,065
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jul 2014, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
New from Hill & Wang: On Democracy's Doorstep: The Inside Story of How the Supreme Court Brought "One Person, One Vote" to the United States, by J. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 7:28 am by David Lat
Dukes [Supreme Court of the United States] Wal-Mart v. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 3:44 pm by Gregory Barbee
On March 4, 2014, the United States Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision, expanded the protections offered to whistleblowers under anti-fraud laws, in Lawson v. [read post]
26 Jan 2007, 12:58 pm
Here, Christopher Rugaber writes in the Insurance Journal about the Court's decision to hear United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 8:17 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
  The nation-to-nation relationship we enjoy as tribal nations has never been confined to the borders of the United States. [read post]
18 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
Bankruptcy judges are appointed by majority vote of the judges within a United States Court of Appeals Circuit. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 10:20 am
PREPARED BY: Michael Chernicoff Looser Rules on Sentencing Stir Concerns About Equity [online.wsj.com] The Supreme Court cases of The United State v. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 8:17 am
In particular, this part highlights the spoken and unspoken premises that influenced the result in Bustamonte and outlines Bustamonte's continuing relevance for consent search cases today.Part III examines United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 10:17 pm
The suits could endanger the tobacco industry since the best-selling cigarettes in the United States are labeled as light or low tar. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 8:46 am by Christopher Wright
Justice Scalia also led off the questioning of Assistant to the Solicitor General Anthony Yang, representing the United States as an amicus in support of Edwards. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 10:41 am by Susan Klein
Responding to the government’s argument that the Supreme Court has on previous occasions recognized that a sentencing reduction based upon Section 3582(c)(2) is not governed by the constitutional or remedial holding of United States v. [read post]