Search for: "W. T. SMITH"
Results 1521 - 1540
of 1,604
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jan 2011, 8:55 am
If it isn’t broke, don’t mess with it. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 5:55 am
Key Findings Allowing companies to fully and immediately deduct investments in structures is one of the most cost-efficient ways lawmakers can stimulate investment, create jobs, and boost GDP during a post-pandemic recovery. [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 7:00 am
: (Now, Why Didn’t I Think of That?) [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
Nussbaum (1) Bernard-Henry Lévy (3) Bert Parks (1) Bertrand Russell (1) Bessie Smith (1) Best of the Web (7) bestiality (14) Beta Rube (1) betamax3000 (18) Beth (the commenter) (9) Bette Davis (14) Bette Midler (1) Betty Friedan (8) Betty White (1) Beyonce (18) Bhutan (2) Bianca Jagger (1) Bible (40) Biddy Martin (13) biden (177) Biden gaffes (21) Biff (1) big and small (5) Big Government sounds like a creepy stalker (10) Big Hollywood (1) Big Mike (1) bigotry (22) biking (160)… [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 8:26 pm
I devoted 90 odd pages to this topic in Unocal at 20: Director Primacy in Corporate Takeovers, so I don't expect to be able to make the complete case in a blog post. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 5:00 pm
Well, we don’t know their names, exactly, but at least 5 members of the Supreme Court. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 10:26 am
In considering this new capability we can’t have it both ways. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 1:46 pm
McRae, Robert T. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:33 am
That is simply not how the Court resolved free exercise claims in the generation preceding Smith. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 11:57 am
[W]e believe that the holding in Pennsylvania Firecannot be divorced from the outdated jurisprudential assumptions of its era. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 5:47 am
[W]e focus on the third [element], causation. [read post]
8 May 2019, 12:44 pm
In fact, Republican Representative Tom Brady, the Ranking Minority Member of the Committee, stated in his opening statement at the start of the hearing, “Today the question isn’t whether to expand paid family leave, but how best to achieve it. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 2:00 pm
Smith 13-946Issue: Whether the Ninth Circuit failed to apply the deferential standard of review required by 28 U.S.C. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:18 am
The facts of silica cases, for example, are radically different from early exposure asbestos cases because of the wide diffusion and general equality of knowledge of silica hazards throughout industry, labor, and government.[7] The dangers of occupational exposure to crystalline silica were so well known that the New York Court of Appeals recognized, seventy years ago, that “[i]t is a matter of common knowledge that it is injurious to the lungs and dangerous to health to work in… [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 10:47 am
W. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 1:56 pm
In 2005, when the George W. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 1:03 am
The Field Fisher Privacy and Information Law Blog argues that you shouldn’t rely on consent for most data transfers. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 2:02 pm
Smith v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 7:56 am
The Media Reform Coalition argues that the clauses are crucial: “Without a requirement to show damage, there is a danger that companies can use libel courts as an arm of their PR operations, simply suppressing what they don’t want in the public sphere“. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 7:50 am
Smith, 429 F.3d 706, 710 (7th Cir. 2005); see also Volokh, supra, at 1448-51 (citing dozens of cases where courts raise this concern). [2.] [read post]
