Search for: "Washington v. Roberts" Results 1521 - 1540 of 4,232
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2020, 3:42 am by Edith Roberts
Court-watchers are focusing on Espinoza v. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 3:53 pm
The legal (and music) world is abuzz in response to Chief Justice John Roberts citing Bob Dylan in his dissent in Sprint v. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 3:42 am by Edith Roberts
The first case today is Comcast v. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 3:52 am by Edith Roberts
” For The Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports that “[w]hen the U.S. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 4:24 am by Edith Roberts
” Bethany Berger analyzes Tuesday’s argument in Washington State Department of Licensing v. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 6:38 am by Adam Chandler
Kentucky and oral argument in Carachuri-Rosendo v. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 3:55 am by Edith Roberts
For The Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports that the “centers seemed to have a strong supporter in Justice Anthony M. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 6:50 pm by Thomas B. Griffith
See, e.g., Ann Marimow’s article in the Washington Post, https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/06/07/judge-david-tatel-supreme-court-memoir/, and Joan Biskupic’s for CNN, https://www.cnn.com/2024/05/29/politics/david-tatel-john-roberts-supreme-court-ruth-bader-ginsburg/index.html). [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 5:34 pm
  The claims arose out of disclosure of her status as a covert operative for the Central Intelligence Agency in a July 14, 2003, column in The Washington Post and other papers by Robert Novak. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 1:26 pm
In the Washington Post, Bill Miller and Robert Barnes have this article; Cary O'Reilly of Bloomberg News reports here; and the ACS Blog has this post on the District Court's ruling in this case. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 6:46 am by James Bickford
  Also in the Washington Post, Robert Barnes considers how the Court may ultimately rule on the health-care law; he suggests that the evidence supports a wide range of predictions. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 6:59 am
  At the Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports on the oral argument, as does Adam Liptak at the New York Times, detailing the Justices' strenuous questioning of both sides; USA Today posits that the Court appeared "poised" to strike down the law, which bans the sale of depictions of animal cruelty. [read post]