Search for: "Waters v. United States" Results 1521 - 1540 of 4,952
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2009, 10:13 pm
Alfonso, 759 F.2d at 736; United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 2:35 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Brook, R. v [2012] EWCA Crim 136 (14 February 2012) Hussain v R. [2012] EWCA Crim 188 (14 February 2012) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Burke v The College of Law & Anor [2012] EWCA Civ 87 (14 February 2012) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Towry EJ Ltd v Bennett & Ors [2012] EWHC 224 (QB) (14 February 2012) High Court (Chancery Division) The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United… [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 7:43 am by Jenna Ard
Recently, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana further shored up the clearly delineated avenues for recovery available to plaintiffs involved in Jones Act and personal injury suits arising under general maritime law. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 7:43 am by Attorney Articles
Recently, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana further shored up the clearly delineated avenues for recovery available to plaintiffs involved in Jones Act and personal injury suits arising under general maritime law. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 6:08 am by skelly
Harvey is the wettest tropical cyclone on record in the United States with peak accumulations of 64.58 inches. [read post]
6 Sep 2014, 8:51 am by Mark S. Humphreys
Fort Worth insurance attorneys who handle hail damage claims need to ready this recent opinion out of the United States District Court, Dallas Division. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 6:24 am by WIMS
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada. [read post]
14 May 2016, 6:24 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
(“Watson”) appeals the final judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Delaware holding that claim 4 of U.S. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 4:56 am by Ben Rubin
  In the petition for review, the CBIA asserted that review is warranted because the Court could resolve a conflict created by the Sixth Appellate District's decision, and "settle the important legal question of how the United States Supreme Court's decision in Koontz applies to in-lieu development fees in California." [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 9:00 am by Suzanne Ilene Schiller
  Just such a “fact-intensive inquiry” was undertaken by the United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan last week in Georgia-Pacific Consumer Products LP v. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 9:00 am by Suzanne Ilene Schiller
Since the United States Supreme Court decided Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]