Search for: "DEFENDER SECURITY COMPANY" Results 1541 - 1560 of 17,830
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Apr 2017, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Cordaro denied the Motion of Defendant, Mutual Benefit Insurance Company, to Sever and Stay a Bad Faith Claim. [read post]
31 Aug 2021, 8:37 am by John Jascob
The suits assert that Go Acquisition and E.Merge IPOs raised $575 million and $600 million, respectively.The three complaints assert the same basic claims:The defendant SPACs are investment companies under the ICA because their primary business is to invest in securities.Investing in securities is all the companies have ever done.The way the defendants have structured the companies poses the precise dangers the ICA sought to address.The… [read post]
1 Nov 2020, 12:57 pm by Kevin LaCroix
”   The memo first examines the coronavirus-related securities lawsuits filed during the May to September time frame that share the characteristics of the earlier filed coronavirus related securities lawsuits – that is, the lawsuits targeted defendant companies (such as pharmaceutical companies and diagnostic testing companies) directly involved in the response to the pandemic and defendant companies in… [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 2:16 am by Kevin LaCroix
In yet another U.S. securities class action lawsuit involving a non-U.S. company and a corruption investigation in the company’s home country, on March 19, 2015 a shareholder of Chemical & Mining Company of Chile, Inc. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 6:00 am by SECLaw Staff
” SEC, US Attorney and FBI Announced 13 Charged in Connection with Securities Kickback Schemes [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 1:10 pm by Varellas & Varellas
The Plaintiff rejected the low offer and proceeded to secure a judgment of liability against the Defendant and then secured a judgment finding that the various exclusions claimed by the insurance company did not in fact apply to the Plaintiff’s claims. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 6:01 am by Varellas & Varellas
The Plaintiff rejected the low offer and proceeded to secure a judgment of liability against the Defendant and then secured a judgment finding that the various exclusions claimed by the insurance company did not in fact apply to the Plaintiff’s claims. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 7:00 am by Varellas & Varellas
The Plaintiff rejected the low offer and proceeded to secure a judgment of liability against the Defendant and then secured a judgment finding that the various exclusions claimed by the insurance company did not in fact apply to the Plaintiff’s claims. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 6:00 am by Varellas & Varellas
The Plaintiff rejected the low offer and proceeded to secure a judgment of liability against the Defendant and then secured a judgment finding that the various exclusions claimed by the insurance company did not in fact apply to the Plaintiff’s claims. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 7:00 am by Varellas & Varellas
The Plaintiff rejected the low offer and proceeded to secure a judgment of liability against the Defendant and then secured a judgment finding that the various exclusions claimed by the insurance company did not in fact apply to the Plaintiff’s claims. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 9:30 am by Neumann Law Group
The defendant denied making statements about only putting the guard on when insurance companies conducted inspections. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 7:20 pm by David Smyth
  But once a defendant has been found to have acted as an unregistered securities broker, trouble follows if the defendant has also been charged with securities fraud. [read post]
15 Jun 2008, 2:09 pm
June 11, 2008) (Kearse, Calabresi, Katzmann, CJJ)In this case, the court concludes that interests in film production companies were "investment contracts," and hence securities, under federal securities law. [read post]
2 Aug 2014, 5:00 pm
Defendants may get charged for opening another account with another person's name, birth date, or Social Security number. [read post]
26 May 2015, 8:35 am by Allison Tussey
The defendant faces a maximum penalty of five years in federal prison. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 5:23 am by Kevin LaCroix
  Discussion While the plaintiffs’ amended did complaint did in one specific respect survive defendants’ dismissal motions, the outcome of the dismissal motions shows as a general matter how difficult it is for plaintiffs to try to transform allegations of sexual misconduct involving one corporate executive into a securities claim against the executive’s company or other company officials. [read post]