Search for: "Louisiana v. United States" Results 1541 - 1560 of 2,350
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jul 2010, 4:42 am by Dianne Saxe
Section 1538(a) as well as BP’s lease with the United States, which requires that BP complies with all environmental statutes and regulations. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 4:53 pm by John Elwood
   United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 10:35 am by John Elwood
Louisiana issues that notched yet another relist Johnson v. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 7:08 am by John Elwood
United States, 14-282, is yet another gift from the St. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 12:34 pm by John Elwood
The former Tweeter Laureate of Texas from the good old days of Twitter, Judge Don Willett, questioned whether the majority’s “exotic” negligent-protest theory could be squared with Louisiana state law’s general rule against tort liability for the criminal acts of others, suggesting that the duty question should have been certified to the Louisiana Supreme Court. [read post]
10 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
The federal law was clearly (indeed obviously) unconstitutional under Johnson, and the Supreme Court so held in 1990 in United States v. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 7:47 am
This Guide was compiled by United Cerebral Palsy as a comprehensive One-Stop Resource Guide to help locate assistance. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 10:59 am by John Elwood
United States, 14-29, have now been rescheduled three times. [read post]
11 May 2010, 8:19 pm by cdw
As Solicitor General, I would represent the interests of the United States, as expressed in legislation and executive policy. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 9:55 am by John Elwood
  The state asks (1) whether the Michigan courts’ decision not to extend United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 4:33 am by SHG
United States v Bagley, 473 U.S. 667 (1985). [read post]
10 May 2009, 5:53 pm
United States Issue: Whether the facially valid indictment of William Jefferson, a Member of Congress from Louisiana, should be dismissed when evidence privileged under the Speech or Debate Clause was used in the grand jury to obtain the indictment. [read post]