Search for: "MATTER OF C B J B" Results 1541 - 1560 of 3,062
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2015, 3:23 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Despite the agency's diligent efforts, the father failed to avail himself of the various resources necessary for reunification (see, Social Services Law § 384-b[7][c]; Matter of Reggie B., 223 A.D.2d 471, 636 N.Y.S.2d 790; Matter of Dutchess County Dept. of Social Servs. [read post]
26 May 2015, 3:23 pm
Despite the agency's diligent efforts, the father failed to avail himself of the various resources necessary for reunification (see, Social Services Law § 384-b[7][c]; Matter of Reggie B., 223 A.D.2d 471, 636 N.Y.S.2d 790; Matter of Dutchess County Dept. of Social Servs. [read post]
26 May 2015, 9:51 am by Rebecca Tushnet
(A) we’re not, (B) if we were that would be troubling, (C) we are so far away from the purpose of the DMCA to protect (c) works from (c) infringement. [read post]
26 May 2015, 8:19 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Green: yes, b/c we believed it was necessary. [read post]
25 May 2015, 9:00 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Despite the agency’s diligent efforts, the father failed to avail himself of the various resources necessary for reunification (see, Social Services Law § 384-b[7][c]; Matter of Reggie B., 223 A.D.2d 471, 636 N.Y.S.2d 790; Matter of Dutchess County Dept. of Social Servs. [read post]
23 May 2015, 9:00 pm by Stephen Bilkis
In Vitti, the Family Court of Dutchess County (Marlow, J.) made two findings of violation of final order of protection issued to the wife and children against the husband. [read post]
14 May 2015, 12:57 am by INFORRM
It is worth recalling exactly what Eady J said: “A search engine, however, is a different kind of Internet intermediary. [read post]
13 May 2015, 10:33 pm by Jan von Hein
Marianne Andrae, First decisions of the ECJ to the Interpretation of Article 12(3) Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003, Comment to Cases C 436/13 and C 656/13 Article 12 (3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003 applies to separated matters of parental responsibility. [read post]
13 May 2015, 2:09 am by Giles Peaker
The question of who constitutes the “ordinary homeless person” for the purpose of the so-called Pereira test cannot be answered purely statistically. 6  ‘Vulnerable’ in s.189(1)(c) should not be taken as meaning that those falling in (a), (b) and (d) are also vulnerable. [read post]
12 May 2015, 4:42 pm
But proving this specific factual assertion (and proving, by clear and convincing evidence, that defendants knew this assertion was likely false) would be very hard. c. [read post]
12 May 2015, 1:10 pm
What happens if the whistleblower complaint relates to matters other than Section 4(1)(d), (e) and (j)? [read post]
11 May 2015, 11:01 pm
Imagine you’re flying from the United States to a foreign country and you’re carrying a laptop. [read post]
7 May 2015, 11:31 am by Schachtman
Historically, the claim of consensus has been the first refuge of scoundrels; it is a way to avoid debate by claiming that the matter is already settled. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
In the context of court proceedings, section 2(b) of the Charter serves as a central pillar for the open court principle. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 11:43 pm
Although Birss J did not refer to recent decisions of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) on the right of communication/making available to the public, he appeared to dismiss implicitly the approach taken in Svensson [Katposts here] and its progeny, ie BestWater [here] and C More Entertainment [here and here]. [read post]