Search for: "Means v. State"
Results 1541 - 1560
of 61,654
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2014, 11:00 am
(3) Score one for consistency: Justice Alito’s test for when officers can remove a objector to trigger the usual common authority test of United States v. [read post]
7 May 2013, 9:00 am
Yesterday we looked at a California federal court decision in Martensen v. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 10:32 am
United States, 328 U.S. 61, 70 (1946). [read post]
20 May 2013, 5:23 am
SL v Westminster [2013] UKSC 27 is a very important case concerning the meaning of “care and attention” in the context of s.21, National Assitance Act 1948.We can only apologise for not writing it up sooner. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 7:15 am
Gender Inequality in 21st Century Britain: Using litigation as a tool Direct Sex Discrimination and Disadvantage to women: R (Coll) v Secretary of State for Justice [2017] UKSC 40 Introduction: Does Law Have a Gender? [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 12:00 am
That the United States Supreme Court decided to hear the case of King v. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 8:17 am
Aristotle International, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 3:15 pm
What does this landmark decision mean for Indiana, where same-sex marriage has been legal since the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals overturned the state's same-sex marriage ban in the fall of 2014? [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 8:55 am
This history suggests that the original understanding of the Fourteenth Amendment supports decisions like Brown v. [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 8:56 am
Aguiniga v. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 2:27 pm
(Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware, March 19, 2021, Tetragon Financial Group Limited v. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 11:09 am
State Constitution Protection for Free Speech Censorship enthusiasts love citing the California Supreme Court Pruneyard v. [read post]
12 Sep 2007, 7:31 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 6:00 am
The state court case was removed to federal court on diversity grounds and the Second Circuit had to determine whether Trump's allegedly defamatory comments were made within the scope of his employment as President of the United States.The case is Carroll v. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 2:21 pm
State v. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 2:21 pm
State v. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 9:48 am
State v. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 11:36 am
The Supreme Court will soon hear oral arguments in Pottawattamie County v. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 10:00 pm
And the Strasbourg Court has stated unambiguously that it regards the strictest institution permitted by UK law, the Special Immigration Appeals Commission (SIAC), to be a ”fully independent court” which is best placed to ensure that no material was unnecessarily withheld from the detainee (A v United Kingdom 49 EHRR 695). [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 6:50 am
Bill C-75: What Does It Mean in Effect? [read post]
