Search for: "P. v. Heard" Results 1541 - 1560 of 2,208
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm by Bexis
  We already did that in connection with the original decision in Conte v. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 4:00 am by Ian Mackenzie
C.A.), at p. 141) While some jurisdictions have recently favoured time limits for the cross-examination of vulnerable witness (Begg v. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 6:16 pm
United Kingdom (1980), 3 E.H.R.R. 408 (Comm.), at p. 415, applied in Re F (in utero), supra. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 6:15 am by Ilene Cooper
This was the result achieved by the Second Department’s opinion in Campbell v. [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 3:57 pm by Cicely Wilson
Despite its earlier assurances, the government presented at trial voice identification testimony from a police officer based on what the officer had heard at the proffer session. [read post]
24 May 2008, 11:31 pm
X------------------------------------------------------- I know I know plaintiff lawyers... you've read or heard about Macomber v Travelers and/or Spencer v Hartford and been fed the facts and the propaganda- you're thinking "how can I trust these people? [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
" The motions were heard by Broome County Supreme Court Justice Ferris D. [read post]