Search for: "People v Lord"
Results 1541 - 1560
of 1,806
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2010, 1:34 pm
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton put Arizona on noticeceded US land to Mexican drug lords. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 2:55 am
The story was broken by The People which included detailed and intrusive material and photographs. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 1:13 am
We know from cases such as Mosley, McKennit v Ash and Naomi Campell that it covers the publication of information that is obviously private, such as that pertaining to health, medical treatment, sexual life, private finance and family life. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 1:00 am
Lord et al, writing about Article 13 of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, which protects people with disabilities’ right to access justice, note that: “Access to justice” is a broad concept, encompassing people’s effective access to the systems, procedures, information, and locations used in the administration of justice. [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 9:17 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 6:27 am
“ Meanwhile, the Second Reading of Lord Lester’s Defamation Bill is to be on 9 July 2010, Lords Lester, Pannick and McNally are listed as speaking, along with Baroness Young of Hornsey. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 5:25 pm
The novel was not a work of pure fiction, but included real people and information presented as “fact”. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 1:08 pm
Malpas v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 7:20 am
He gave two reasons for his conclusion i) It is in accordance with the true interpretation of Lord Atkin’s speech in Sim. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 4:11 am
By way of introduction, Lord Brown noted that the majority in the House of Lords in Secretary of State for the Home Department v JJ [2008] 1 AC 385 held that deprivation of liberty might take a variety of forms other than classic detention in prison or strict arrest. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 1:30 am
They were shooting innocent people. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 11:06 pm
In difficult cases which involve more people or potentially serious failings by the state, the investigative obligation can also lead to the requirement to conduct public inquiries. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 11:51 am
” Better Courts Now complains that Roe v. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 5:55 pm
It is said to concentrate on the people surrounding Rooney rather than on his footballing career. [read post]
6 Jun 2010, 2:39 am
Nevertheless, the “single meaning” rule has been well established in the law for two hundred years and was endorsed by the House of Lords in Charleston v News Group Newspapers [1995] 2 AC 65. [read post]
5 Jun 2010, 3:43 pm
Without authority, I should have thought it would be enough to satisfy the criterion of falsity for the plaintiff to prove that the defendant made a statement which was false to a substantial number of people. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 2:07 am
Mr Justice Wyn Williams referred to the well known case of Anufrijeva v London Borough of Southwark for the relevant principles on appropriate remedies under the Human Rights Act. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 5:22 am
The case does not make new law, relying as it does on the House of Lords' test in Stack v Dowden, yet two judges in the lower courts and one Lord Justice in the Court of Appeal, applying that test, considered that the respondent was entitled to a 90% share in the property. [read post]
30 May 2010, 2:32 am
Lord Pannick suggested shortly before the election that prisoners may be entitled to around £750 compensation if denied the vote. [read post]
29 May 2010, 4:18 am
In the UK judgment in Campbell v MGN – the seminal case that effectively launched privacy actions in the UK – the publishers at Mirror Group Newspapers may ultimately have gone down in the House of Lords on a 3:2 majority, but there was no question that they could possibly ‘go down’ in the criminal sense. [read post]
