Search for: "People v. Harris" Results 1541 - 1560 of 2,451
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2013, 9:07 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Change in use would matter—commercializing the Harry Potter Encyclopedia. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 4:00 am by Cordell Parvin
  For many years in the 90s, Nancy and I would join Harry and Phyllis and another couple for the Bears v. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 10:00 am by Dan Ernst
The Jones and Harry opinions echo, without citation, Lord Mansfield's words in Somerset v. [read post]
20 Jul 2013, 10:39 am by Larry Catá Backer
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2013) In his 2004 Storrs Lecture, Gunther Teubner asked:how is constitutional theory to respond to the challenge arising form three current major trends—digitization, privatization and globalization—for the inclusion/exclusion problem? [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 4:28 am by David DePaolo
The form, shape, operative rules, etc. may differ from one economy to another, but in the end it is this obligation to the social order that provides economic vitality.The Texas case above is out of the 1st District Court of Appeals, titled Forged Components v. [read post]
15 Jun 2013, 7:00 am by Raffaela Wakeman
Like most people accessing the Internet this week, we at Lawfare were a bit focused on everything related to the Edward Snowden leaks. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 9:38 am by Judy Selby
As reported here in April, an Illinois federal district court certified a privacy class that could number tens of millions of plaintiffs in the case of Harris v. comScore. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am by Soroush Seifi
The overwhelming result of all trials ends in a verdict of guilt for the accused and at that point another state official (bailiff, prison warden, parole officer, etc.) is obligated to apply the decision.[9]  However, Dubber clarifies that the reference to the State in the style of cause is not thought to be a requirement for the publicness of a dispute.[10]  He cites German cases that refer simply to the ‘Criminal Case against X’; a reference to ‘the… [read post]