Search for: "People v. Sole"
Results 1541 - 1560
of 6,175
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2016, 8:01 am
In Sturgeon v. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 4:00 am
The recent decision of the Supreme Court of Canada in, R. v. [read post]
24 May 2018, 5:34 pm
Apple v. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 3:29 pm
In EEOC v. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 3:29 pm
In EEOC v. [read post]
4 May 2016, 5:25 am
Over the past months, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has had to open three different files in this regard, with one glorious EU country (Poland), and a couple of UK judges seeking clarification as to the lawfulness of the Directive under different standpoints [Cases C-358/14, Poland v Parliament and Council; C-477/14, Pillbox 38(UK) Limited v Secretary of State for Health; and C-547/14, Philip Morris Brands SARL and Others v Secretary of State for… [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 2:51 pm
In United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 8:12 am
There are two types of people in D.C.: those who can’t handle a little bit of snow; and those who enjoy ridiculing them. [read post]
30 Aug 2018, 2:18 pm
" (Van Natta v. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 5:13 am
U.S. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2009, 1:01 am
People have rights. [read post]
Senate Judiciary Committee Passes Amendment to Prohibit Prosecutions for Terms-of-Service Violations
16 Sep 2011, 11:45 am
Nosal, still pending in the Ninth Circuit) and they could not prosecute Internet users for Terms of Service violations (as they tried to do in United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2009, 9:38 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 4:45 pm
A fine is unconstitutionally excessive if it “notably exceeds in amount that which is reasonable, usual, proper or just” (People v Saffore, 18 NY2d 101, 104 [1966]). [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 5:06 pm
Kristen Larson and Regina Keenan In Tracey v. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 11:54 pm
But circumstances do arise where people are so incompatible that they simply cannot live together. [read post]
19 Nov 2017, 5:45 am
The court granted the injunction solely relying on the provisions of the CDA. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 1:12 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKTortsNegligent Failure to Warn Is Sole Surviving Claim In Porter's Suit Against Maker of Garbage Compactor Colon v. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 1:12 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKTortsNegligent Failure to Warn Is Sole Surviving Claim In Porter's Suit Against Maker of Garbage Compactor Colon v. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 8:27 am
[www.nylj.com]
Subscription required for online access:
APPELLATE DIVISIONFIRST DEPARTMENTCriminal PracticeLarceny Conviction Stands Despite Improper Bolstering of Sole Identifying Witness' Credibility People, respondent v. [read post]
