Search for: "Plaintiff 1 et al v. Wells et al" Results 1541 - 1560 of 1,704
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jan 2011, 8:29 pm by Schachtman
  The Supreme Court recognized this connection in General Electric v. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 10:49 am by Eric Goldman
The AOL et al brief explains, Amici cannot emphasize enough the degree to which the protection afforded by Section 230(c)(1), as consistently interpreted by courts, has played a critical role in fostering the development and growth of interactive services that both empower users and encourage innovation and self-regulation…. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am by Ben
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 10:33 am by David Kopel
According to the statute, if person A provided well-founded evidence to a court that person B threatened "injury or a breach of the peace," then the court could issue an order presenting B with two choices: 1. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 3:24 pm by Arthur F. Coon
Exposition Metro Line Construction Authority, et al (8/5/13) ___ Cal.4th ___, 2013 WL 3970107. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 12:00 pm by Stefanie Levine
”[2]  These decisions have benefits and risks for both plaintiffs and defendants in litigation that include both settlement strategies as well as expert testimony. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 5:01 am by Jordan Brunner
Interestingly, while Section 1237(a)(1) permits the president to invoke his authority under the IEEPA without declaring a national emergency, the Trump administration made it clear that its authority to act through the executive order was based on such a declaration. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am by Ben
Well Marie-Andree cited that 1879 case  Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 4:08 pm by admin
When expert witnesses rely upon one or a few studies, which telegraph internal validity, this litigation strategy may provide the strongest evidence against the study’s being reasonably relied upon, or its providing “sufficient facts and data” to support an admissible expert witness opinion. [1] Daubert v. [read post]
  Although EPA initially chose to exclude these uses from its analysis, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ordered EPA to include them following a successful legal challenge lodged by consumer groups in Safer Chemicals Healthy Families, et al. v. [read post]