Search for: "Read v. United States" Results 1541 - 1560 of 30,053
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2023, 2:45 pm by Mavrick Law Firm
  The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit in Penalty Kick Management Ltd. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 2:19 pm by John Ross
She sues his employer (the United States) for negligence under the Federal Tort Claims Act. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 9:41 am by Eugene Volokh
Its brief highlights how hate speech laws have been weaponized in other countries and even in the United States against "those who simply adhere to and express traditional moral views that are unpopular with those in power. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 4:30 am by Eric Segall
Children learn early on in their education that the United States Government is one of separated powers. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 9:07 pm by Tyler Hoguet
Secretary of the Interior Deb Haaland stated that the program reflects the Biden-Harris Administration’s commitment to clean energy and the United States’s growing offshore wind industry. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 12:50 pm by becassidy
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, case number 1:23-cv-02950, filed in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 12:46 pm by Brett Natarelli
On October 3, the second morning of its new term, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) heard oral arguments in the case of Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:41 am by Norman L. Eisen
Expand all Collapse all Relevant Court Proceedings United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 5:59 am by Chip Merlin
  My prediction is that this legal difference of opinion is important enough to have the United States Supreme Court review the matter. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 4:29 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“Allegations regarding an act of deceit or intent to deceive must be stated with particularity” (Bill Birds, Inc. v Stein Law Firm, P.C., 164 AD3d 635, 637, affd 35 NY3d 173; see Palmieri v Perry, Van Etten, Rozanski & Primavera, LLP, 200 AD3d at 785). [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
That is, the court held that where the legislature granted wide discretion to the agency, such as to “have regard to” stated factors in taking a decision, a court should go no further than ensuring that the agency, in fact, has taken account of the stated factors and “struck a reasonable equilibrium between them”. [read post]