Search for: "State v Cooper" Results 1541 - 1560 of 8,564
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 May 2009, 1:02 am
The court of appeals tethers this holding to Klapesky v. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 5:51 pm
Union itself is a fund manager and member of a cooperative of financial institutions, consisting almost entirely of banks (see here, in German) and two of its main shareholders are banks, namely DZ Bank AG and WGZ Bank AG. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 9:23 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
In response to the recent Equal Protection challenge to ICWA by a small number of states in Haaland v. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 1:53 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Global Process Systems Inc & Anor v Berhad [2009] EWCA Civ 1398 (17 December 2009) Boots Company Plc v HM Revenue & Customs [2009] EWCA Civ 1396 (17 December 2009) National Navigation Co v Endesa Generacion SA [2009] EWCA Civ 1397 (17 December 2009) Cooper & Ors v Fanmailuk.Com Ltd & Anor [2009] EWCA Civ 1368 (17 December 2009) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Fleet v Fleet [2009] EWHC… [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 12:08 pm by Travis Crabtree
  The FTC normally notifies a company they are under investigation,everyone cooperates and there is a settlement. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 7:50 am by Wanda Gomez
” The brief urged the Court to re-examine the dual sovereignty doctrine, especially in light of the  expanded federalization of crime, in an age of cooperative federalism between federal and state  governments. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
However, in its December 5, 2013 opinion in Venecia V. v August V., the Appellate Division, First Department, held that no malpractice had been committed, and no hearing was required to reach that conclusion. [read post]
29 May 2010, 7:48 pm
However, Peter King of Sports Illustrated stated that the decision may not be the champagne-popping moment for the NFLPA. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" The court also rejected Plaintiff's argument that DOE's "Position Statement" was unsigned and undated hearsay, noting "Generally, administrative proceedings need not conform to all of the ... evidentiary rules adhered to in judicial tribunals", citing Matter of Church of Scientology of N.Y. v Tax Commn. of City of N.Y., 120 AD2 376, nor need an agency "state with specificity its detailed analysis," or "point to any… [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 11:41 am by NARF
Cayuga Nation (Indian Gaming Regulatory Act; Fee Lands; Reservation Disestablishment) Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa Indians v. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" The court also rejected Plaintiff's argument that DOE's "Position Statement" was unsigned and undated hearsay, noting "Generally, administrative proceedings need not conform to all of the ... evidentiary rules adhered to in judicial tribunals", citing Matter of Church of Scientology of N.Y. v Tax Commn. of City of N.Y., 120 AD2 376, nor need an agency "state with specificity its detailed analysis," or "point to any… [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 10:10 pm by Matthias Weller
In its judgment of 8 February 2024, the CJEU had to decide whether “the application of the Brussels Ibis Regulation be based solely on the fact that two parties with their seat in the same Member State agree on the jurisdiction of courts of another EU Member State. [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 10:35 am by Guest Blogger
Timothy Jost On January 28, 2015, thirty amicus briefs were filed in the Supreme Court supporting the validity of the Internal Revenue Service rule in King v. [read post]