Search for: "State v. Abbott" Results 1541 - 1560 of 1,794
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jan 2024, 4:00 am by Alan Macek
The approach in [Abbott Laboratories v Canada (Minister of Health), 2009 FC 648] suggests that where an inventor can trace the origin of the divisional back to the forced divisional application it will be immune from double patenting attacks. [read post]
7 Jan 2012, 4:16 pm by Charon QC
For my part, whatever it is worth, I don’t think that Diane Abbott MP is a racist. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 11:54 am by Ashley Moye
Examples are drawn from research problems that became evident in Abbott v. [read post]
5 May 2010, 10:14 pm
Abbott Labs., 512 F.3d 1363, 1378 (Fed. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 9:00 am by William Banks
  Texas Governor Greg Abbott reacted with a statement claiming that the Constitution grants states a right to defend themselves against “invasion,” and that Texas authority “supersedes any federal statutes to the contrary. [read post]
26 Aug 2024, 3:18 pm by centerforartlaw
Landmark Copyright case: Thaler v Perlmutter[3] (For an in-depth case review of Thaler v. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 9:30 pm by Ronald M. Levin
As is well known, pre-enforcement review of rules was not recognized as an option in other APA proceedings until 1967, when the Supreme Court decided Abbott Laboratories v. [read post]
17 Nov 2019, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
United States In South Carolina the case of Charleston City Paper has confirmed libel law principles, Blog Law Online comments. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 11:56 am by Raffaela Wakeman
He has more information from Dean Abbott of Abbott Analytics about “predictive analysis,” the process by which data miners acquire intelligence from large data sets: “You start with an anchor—say, Person A—which is a place to start your network from,” Abbott says. [read post]
13 May 2018, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
The National Magazine considers the state of defamation law in Canada. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 8:29 pm
Torres, No. 072331 Sentence of 188 to 235 months for possession of crack cocaine with intent to distribute is affirmed where: 1) the court did not abuse its discretion in counting both the state drug offense and the state gun offense as contributing to defendant's status as a career offender; 2) the district court was correct in finding the state gun conviction to be a "crime of violence" for career-offender purposes; and 3) district court was compelled to… [read post]