Search for: "United States v. State of Michigan" Results 1541 - 1560 of 3,230
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 May 2009, 2:05 pm
Supreme Court's 1984 decision in United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 6:52 am by Ben Allen
  The Court agreed, holding that the district court incorrectly relied upon Sixth Circuit precedent in United States v. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Ravitch, The Japanese Prime Minister's Visits to the Yasukuni Shrine Analyzed Under Articles 20 and 89 of the Japanese Constitution, (Michigan State University College of Law Journal of International Law, Vol. 22, No. 3, 2014).Tomas Berkmanas, Natural Law and Political Ontology: A Historico-Philosophical Outline of a Major Human Transformation, (Baltic Journal of Law & Politics 7:2 (2014): 119-151).From SmartCILP:Moamen Gouda & Dawood I. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 9:30 pm by ernst
Jackson Lecturer on the Supreme Court of the United States at the Chautauqua Institution. [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 12:42 am
Vinton Packaging Group, Inc., a case from the United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan decided on October 2, 2007, presented the court with just those questions. [read post]
6 Jan 2025, 8:24 am by Kalvis Golde
The Supreme Court’s landmark 2022 gun-rights ruling in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 5:30 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
A copy of the New Jersey' court's preliminary injunction opinion is available here.Non-Competes in BankruptcyThe United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Illinois held in United Providers, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 11:32 am by Justin Riemer
” In 2016, President Donald Trump carried Michigan and Pennsylvania, states no Republican presidential candidate had won since 1988. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 12:49 pm by WIMS
Supreme Court in the case of Citizens United v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am by Tana Fye
”[27]              The United States Supreme Court recognized that the proceeding at issue was a “child custody proceeding” and that the children involved in that proceeding were “Indian children. [read post]