Search for: "A,B,C Insurance Companies" Results 1561 - 1580 of 2,924
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Oct 2013, 7:20 am by Schachtman
Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania, No. 12‐2688 (7th Cir. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 8:01 am
If the coverage issue is a) independent of, or b) extrinsic to, the issues in the underlying action, c) or the damages are only partly covered by the policy. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 6:50 am by Mark S. Humphreys
Futrell had paid a premium of $17.00 to the Defendant, Indiana Lumbermens Mutual Insurance Company, for coverage under Part II of said policy entitled 'Expenses for Medical Services." [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:57 am by Tom Cummings
Medicare Part C (aka Medicare Advantage) offers healthcare plan options run by Medicare-approved private insurance companies. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 3:35 pm by Law Lady
TEAGUE, Appellee. 4th District.Dissolution of marriage -- Trial court abused discretion in requiring former husband to maintain life insurance policy as security for alimony without finding that husband could afford to maintain the policy and without finding that life insurance was necessary to secure alimony obligationJEFFREY FROESCHLE, Appellant, v. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 6:08 am by Schachtman
Lanza (a medical director of Metropolitan Life Insurance Company) in hiding the extent of acute silicosis amongst the tunnellers. [read post]
13 Oct 2013, 3:21 pm
To effectively alter the designation of a beneficiary to whom or for whose benefit insurance money is to be payable, the insured must sign an instrument:(a) with respect to which an endorsement is made on the policy,(b) that identifies the contract, or(c) that describes the insurance or insurance fund or a part of it … [57]         The deceased’s last will and testament identifies… [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 9:21 am by Carney Law Firm
 Many of these insurance company “independent” doctors, commonly referred to as “IME” doctors, do not even treat patients – their entire income is derived from performing examinations on behalf of insurance companies seeking a medical report to utilize to deny a claim, decrease claim payments, and maximize the insurance company’s profits. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 3:18 am
Contents include:2013 Lalive Lecture Alain Pellet, The Case Law of the ICJ in Investment ArbitrationCase CommentsWalid Ben Hamida, SAUR International SA c République argentine: Droit national, droit international et droits de l’homme : l’histoire d’un ménage à trois Irmgard Marboe, Quasar de Valores SICAV SA and others v The Russian Federation: Another Chapter of the Yucos Affair Julian Davis Mortenson, Quiborax SA et al v Plurinational State of… [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 6:53 am by Mark S. Humphreys
In Moriel, which was a "bad faith" case, the court held that the plaintiff must show that the insurance company had "no reasonable basis" to deny or delay payment of the claim and that the insurance company committed an act that was likely to cause serious injury beyond the injury associated with the underlying breach of the insurance contract. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 7:53 am by Arina Shulga
It is important to remember that if a Rule 506(c) fails, the company cannot simply switch to using Rule 506(b) or Section 4(2) private placement because Rule 506(b) or Section 4(2) do not permit general solicitation or advertising. 4. [read post]
22 Sep 2013, 8:35 pm by Megan Muir
The SEC also included a form of “grandfather” provision in new Rule 506(c)(2)(ii)(D), which provides that for existing investors who were accredited investors in a Rule 506(b) offering prior to the effective date of Rule 506(c), a self-certification of accreditation status by such investor at the time of sale in a new offering by the same issuer under Rule 506(c) will be deemed to satisfy the verification requirement in Rule 506(c). [read post]
22 Sep 2013, 2:35 pm by Megan Muir
The SEC also included a form of “grandfather” provision in new Rule 506(c)(2)(ii)(D), which provides that for existing investors who were accredited investors in a Rule 506(b) offering prior to the effective date of Rule 506(c), a self-certification of accreditation status by such investor at the time of sale in a new offering by the same issuer under Rule 506(c) will be deemed to satisfy the verification requirement in Rule 506(c). [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 1:38 am by Kevin LaCroix
The insurers have argued that all of the claims are interrelated and therefore that only a single tower of insurance was triggered. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 7:51 am by Philip J. Berenz
 (d) A settling defendant shall pay all sums due to the plaintiff within 30 days of tender by the plaintiff of the executed release and all applicable documents in compliance with subsections (a), (b), and (c) of this Section. [read post]
1 Sep 2013, 10:04 am by Mark Zamora
Conway Express, Inc., 261 Ga. 41 (1991); Georgia Power Company v. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 7:55 am by Daniel E. Cummins
The Medical Protective Company, et.al., No. 2010-CV-7058 (C.P. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 7:55 am by Daniel E. Cummins
The Medical Protective Company, et.al., No. 2010-CV-7058 (C.P. [read post]