Search for: "Basis International Ltd."
Results 1561 - 1580
of 1,809
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2010, 10:26 am
Lord Black, the former chief executive of Hollinger International Ltd, contends that he was not required to file tax returns because he was not a US resident. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 3:15 am
Justice Binnie in WIC Radio Ltd. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 8:15 pm
DeMonte Fabricating, Ltd., 550 F.3d 1356, 1366-67 (Fed. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 6:38 am
Exxon Insurance Consultants International Ltd [1982] Ch. 119, in which the English court held one word was too short to be a literary work. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 12:25 am
Magaldi (EPLAW) District Court The Hague finds plaintiff’s amended claims cannot be basis of seizure: Newell Rubbermaid v. [read post]
17 Jul 2010, 2:11 am
Where the publication relates to a situation occurring in another country or where the sources for the defendant’s story are in a different country, it was accepted by Gray J in Al Misnad v Azzaman Ltd ([2003] EWHC 1783 (QB)) that the test of responsible journalism may have to be adapted to take account of these factors. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 10:32 am
In this line of authority the court has taken the view that a claim for (what is really) defamation has been dressed up in the guise of another cause of action, breach of confidence (See Service Corp International plc v Channel Four [1999] EMLR 83 and Tillery Valley Foods Ltd v Channel Four [2004] EWHC 1075 (Ch)) for instance, in an attempt to get round the rule in Bonnard v Perryman and take advantage of the relatively beneficent American Cyanamid or section 12 HRA… [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 11:28 pm
Thus, as the Tribunal noted: It is thus fallacious to proceed on the basis that territorial nexus to a tax jurisdiction being sine qua non to taxability in a jurisdiction is a normal international practice in all systems. [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 2:43 am
In Abdullah Ahmadi v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd Rothman J ordered the defendant to pay the plaintiff US$7,500 damages in respect of an allegation that he was a people smuggler. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 4:32 pm
Hoshino Gakki Co., Ltd., 840 F.2d 1572, 1577 (Fed. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 10:44 am
" International Shoe v. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 6:31 am
– FCA orders jail time for contempt of court on basis of disobedience of earlier injunctions: Deckers Outdoor Corporation Inc. v Farley (No 8) (Patentology) (IPKat) FCA: Copyright in medical records: Primary Health Care Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (IP Whiteboard) Are those real? [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 6:02 pm
– FCA orders jail time for contempt of court on basis of disobedience of earlier injunctions: Deckers Outdoor Corporation Inc. v Farley (No (Patentology) (IPKat) FCA: Copyright in medical records: Primary Health Care Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (IP Whiteboard) Are those real? [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 2:03 pm
The International Law Office has an article about strike outs in English libel proceedings, “Stricter with strike-out? [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 1:46 am
On 29 April 2010, European Advocate General Kokott gave her opinion in the case of Akzo Nobel Chemicals Ltd & Akcros Chemicals Ltd v European Commission. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 2:45 pm
., Ltd. and AmTran Logistics, Inc. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 10:00 pm
In the alternative – if that analysis was wrong – the judge found that the decision to make and affirm the Order must be part of a process of determination of the bank’s civil rights of the kind analysed by Lord Clyde in R (Alconbury) Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment [2003] 2 AC 295 in paragraphs 145 to 160. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 2:15 am
Indeed, the effectiveness of the deterrent is the whole basis of Lord Lester’s argument that high awards will have a “chilling effect” on future publications. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 6:10 am
” At this point, neither Amex nor AEFA executives could estimate the range of potential losses, and so, for the first time, began conducting an internal investigation into the extent of the high-yield losses. [read post]
6 Jun 2010, 12:52 am
Qualtex, one of the UK's less successful IP litigants in recent years (see here and here), must have had the smile wiped from their own faces when they lost again -- this time in Numatic International Ltd v Qualtex UK Ltd [2010] EWHC 1237 (C), a Chancery Division ruling from Mr Justice Floyd on 28 May.In this action Numatic sued Qualtex for passing off. [read post]
