Search for: "Birth v. Birth" Results 1561 - 1580 of 7,188
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2010, 2:23 am by gmlevine
  This is the case in National Gardening and was also illustrated recently in Austin Area Birthing Center, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 2:21 am by gmlevine
Forum January 20, 2010), RESUME PRO (registered trademark) and , competitors and abusive registration; and, Austin Area Birthing Center, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 1:11 pm by Paul Horwitz
Doyle: "Partial birth abortion is a gruesome procedure. [read post]
25 Dec 2011, 7:42 am
The Fifth District Court of Appeal issued a 76 page opinion on Friday in the case of T.M.H. v. [read post]
19 May 2014, 3:29 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The criminal court observes at common law that the infant En ventre sa mere was recognized and a legal personality imputed to it as a rule of property for all purposes beneficial to it, but that imputation was regarded as a benevolent fiction granted in anticipation of the child's birth as held in Drobner v Peters. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 12:10 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Carhart, in which the Supreme Court upheld the federal prohibition on “partial birth abortion. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 5:54 pm by INFORRM
(Majrowski v Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Trust [2006] UKHL 34). [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 8:14 am by Charlotte Emmerson
Eligible parents can take up to 50 weeks  SPL in the first year after the birth of their child, or in the first year after their child’s placement for adoption, with up to 37 weeks of Shared Parental Pay (ShPP), depending on how much maternity entitlement the birth parent has taken (or adoption entitlement). [read post]
11 Apr 2007, 10:01 pm
We've previously reported on this case and the underlying Hollins v. [read post]
6 Mar 2010, 9:15 am by Buce
Gendercide--the systematic war against infant females, from before conception to after birth. [read post]
9 May 2007, 1:55 pm
I'm not going to give this question the full treatment, but the leading case on this issue seems to be Moore v. [read post]