Search for: "Does, 1-20"
Results 1561 - 1580
of 27,636
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2015, 4:25 pm
Even opening windows or parking in the shade does little to make a car cooler. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 11:00 pm
(Paragraph 114) 20. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 7:57 am
It does have brevity to commend it: the entire matter is disposed of in 58 paragraphs (or 56 if you discount the concurrences). [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 5:30 am
For example, if a worker is unable to repetitively use a body part for more than two-thirds of a 24-hour period, but the inability is not caused by the compensable injury, the worker does not qualify for a chronic condition impairment value. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 10:56 am
The term also means (1) any agent of such a person, and (2) a State or political subdivision of a State . . . . [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 2:53 pm
Until about 20 years ago, the typical lawyer to secretary ratio was 2:1. [read post]
26 Mar 2021, 2:37 pm
CLS Bank Int’l, 573 U.S. 208 (2014); J.A. 9–20. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 5:00 am
§274a.12(b)(20), a person lawfully employed under A-3, E-1,E-2,E-3,G-5,H-1B, H-2A/B, H-3, I, J-1, L-1, O-1/O-2, P-1/P-2/P-3, R or TN status who timely files an application for extension consistent with 8 C.F.R. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 8:14 am
While the parties agreed that the 20-employee minimum applies to “a person engaged in an industry affecting commerce” and that the term “person” does not include a political subdivision of a state, they disputed whether the 20-employee minimum also applies to a “political subdivision of a State. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 8:35 am
In the federal system, the statute against obstruction of justice/process is published in 18 USC §§ 1501-20 (2007). [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 8:35 am
In the federal system, the statute against obstruction of justice/process is published in 18 USC §§ 1501-20 (2007). [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 8:40 am
On the flipside, employers assert that Amendment 20 does not place any obligation upon companies to accommodate employees who use medical marijuana. [read post]
23 Sep 2017, 12:39 pm
(Docket #187-1 at 77). [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 6:00 am
§274a.12(b)(20), a person lawfully employed under A-3, E-1,E-2,E-3,G-5,H-1B, H-2A/B, H-3, I, J-1, L-1, O-1/O-2, P-1/P-2/P-3, R or TN status who timely files an application for extension consistent with 8 C.F.R. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 8:36 am
Oral Arg. 0:52–1:20. [read post]
16 May 2009, 8:41 pm
Noncommercial stations have been operating under the interim policy set forth in that Notice for almost 20 years. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 7:26 am
The federal act does not define "unreasonable" increase. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 4:49 am
March 3, 2009) [Slip Opn., at 1-3]. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 4:36 pm
[1] David Jones, Sirius, XM Shares Surge on Proposed Merger, New York Business.com, (Feb. 20, 2007), [www.newyorkbusiness.com] [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 5:58 am
Claim 1 as originally filed reads as follows:A method of treating hair comprising the steps of: a) providing a hair building solid agent for use on, or with, one or more of hair, skin and hair building solids for altering and/or maintaining the electrostatic charge of the hair and/or skin such that it has a substantially negative polarity; b) applying said hair building solid agent (30) to one or more of hair (10), skin and hair building solids (20); c) providing hair… [read post]
