Search for: "Does 1 - 33"
Results 1561 - 1580
of 6,149
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Sep 2014, 9:36 pm
., now known as AllPure Technologies LLC, (“AllPure”) does not infringe the asserted claims of U.S. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 10:39 pm
CPR 44.13 provides (emphasis added): “(1) This Section applies to proceedings which include a claim for damages – (a) for personal injuries; (b) under the Fatal Accidents Act 1976; or (c) which arises out of death or personal injury and survives for the benefit of an estate by virtue of section 1(1) of the Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1934, but does not apply to applications pursuant to section 33 of the Senior Courts Act 1981 or… [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 5:00 am
Thus, the inverse proposition is that where a federal action does not find fraud under the ’33 Act or the ’34 Act, such a result would not preclude a finding of fraud under the Martin Act. [read post]
4 Jul 2014, 7:59 am
” Madge Thurlow Macklin, “Pitfalls in Dealing with Cancer Statistics, Especially as Related to Cancer of the Lung,” 14 Diseases Chest 525 532-33, 529-30 (1948). [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 6:53 am
[Continued from yesterday's Part 2 and the preceding Part 1.] [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
§ 1, cl. 1, likewise vests the executive Power in “the President of the United States of America. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 5:00 am
Second, [Shahulhameed] argues that the evidence does not support a finding that he was `without authorization’ at the time the programming changes occurred. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 8:58 am
Does that mean that the Code has other look-back periods? [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 6:23 am
[Continued from yesterday's Part 3 and the preceding Part 1 and Part 2.] [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 12:38 am
As far as I know, Judge Batts’ ruling in the RBS case is the first to hold that Morrison does apply to ’33 Act claims. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 10:04 am
HB 33: Instream Flow Amendments Rep. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 4:30 am
It does, however, have a number of "Basic Laws" that set out the structure of government, elections, offices, and so forth, as well as a limited number of rights. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 2:59 am
All this said, however, if a design falls within the scope of the InfoSoc Directive, then the only requirement for copyright protection under this piece of legislation is that the design is a ‘work’ fulfilling requirements 1. and 2. above. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 3:13 pm
N.J.S.A. 54:33-1. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 4:14 pm
The court also indicated that even if defendant had met the threshold of showing equal burden, “defendant does not meet the specificity requirement of RCFC 33(d)(1)” requiring the responding party to specifically identify the documents which may contain the answers to the interrogatories. [read post]
31 Jul 2024, 9:19 pm
Some parts of the Act commenced on the following day, 29 March, 2024: s.2(1). [read post]
31 Jul 2024, 9:19 pm
Some parts of the Act commenced on the following day, 29 March, 2024: s.2(1). [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
Scope 3 Emissions SB 253 would direct CARB to develop standards for GHG emissions reporting by January 1, 2025, with covered entities then required to begin annual reports following these standards in 2026 (for scope 1 and scope 2 GHG emissions) and in 2027 (for scope 3 emissions).[21] Scope 1 emissions are those that come directly from a company’s operations, such as its factories, heating plants, and vehicle fleets. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 10:25 am
” The promise of limits does not materialize, and it’s worse in C&D situations where they wave registrations around. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 10:13 pm
The term 120 does not include the: 121 1. [read post]
