Search for: "Graves v. State" Results 1561 - 1580 of 2,463
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Apr 2012, 3:38 pm
And in his first State of the Union address, President Obama chastised the court's decision allowing unlimited corporate spending in national elections. [read post]
10 May 2010, 5:06 pm by INFORRM
  The conduct must be sufficiently grave to justify criminal as well as civil sanctions (See Dowson v Northampton Police [2009] EWCA 907 (QB)). [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 1:13 pm by kwalters
The position is created pursuant to the state constitution, currently at Article V, Section 1 of the 1970 Illinois Constitution. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 1:56 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
The Court relied on McDermott International Inc v Burn Standard Co., where the Supreme Court held: “the 1996 Act makes provision for the supervisory role of courts, for the review of the arbitral award only to ensure fairness. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 12:32 pm by John Elwood
And Judge Jacques Wiener wrote that “the original proponents of the FLSA … are turning over in their respective graves. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 10:30 pm by Fiona de Londras
The case of Z v United Kingdom (2001) 34 ECHR 97 illustrates this well. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 10:44 am by John Neiman
The commentary may be underplaying just how momentous a victory yesterday’s decision in National Labor Relations Board v. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 4:00 am by Judith Gaskell
The Bluebook Confronts Slavery was presented by Justin Simard, Alexander Harper, Julie Graves Krishnaswami, and Fred Shapiro. [read post]
As the threatened attacks in Rafah have begun, killing untold numbers of civilians, including children, we call on the international community and member states of the UN to act with the utmost urgency to fully ensure respect for the provisional measures ordered by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in the case regarding the Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide in the Gaza Strip (South Africa v. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 4:59 am by Eric Segall
He rightly criticizes the post-1960's judicial fabrication of an injury-in-fact requirement, and he thinks the Court went wrong in the 1970's with cases like United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2021, 9:54 am by Eric Segall
This limitation is constitutionally mandated, separating our branch from our political co-branches. '[F]ederal judges—who have no constituency—have a duty to respect legitimate policy choices made by those who do.' [quoting Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 12:00 am by Mark Meyer
He described this as like a hand reaching out from the grave to hold a company liable. [read post]