Search for: "In Re: Jones v." Results 1561 - 1580 of 1,981
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am by Hilde
”On September 9th last year, Stevens engaged in a classic version of advocacy-by-interrogation during the argument of Citizens United v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 12:23 am by J
We're always keen to help, so, here is the question. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 12:23 am by J
We're always keen to help, so, here is the question. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
Jones v Associated Newspapers Ltd, June 2007,  Eady J and a Jury. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 6:45 am by Jay Willis
In her preview of Tuesday’s scheduled oral argument in McDonald v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
(ipeg) (IP Watch) Holding up products at EU borders using patents (ipeg) Improving the links between ESOs and the European Patent Office (IP:JUR) General Court affirms earlier Board of Appeal's decision that "James Jones" is confusingly similar to "JACK & JONES", in connection with clothing in Class 25 (Class 46) Clutter on the Community Trademark Register (SOLO Independent IP Practitioners) No strange aroma, but will Longkou Fen Si pass the test? [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
(ipeg) (IP Watch) Holding up products at EU borders using patents (ipeg) Improving the links between ESOs and the European Patent Office (IP:JUR) General Court affirms earlier Board of Appeal's decision that "James Jones" is confusingly similar to "JACK & JONES", in connection with clothing in Class 25 (Class 46) Clutter on the Community Trademark Register (SOLO Independent IP Practitioners) No strange aroma, but will Longkou Fen Si pass the test? [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 2:20 pm by Erin Miller
United States Docket: 09-293 Issue: Whether a litigant moving to re-open a suppression hearing to introduce additional evidence must justify his failure to introduce that evidence at the initial hearing. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 5:54 am by Walter Reaves
The Court of Appeals in El Paso recently addressed one of the problems in State v. [read post]