Search for: "J. v. K." Results 1561 - 1580 of 2,648
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2012, 5:09 pm
Condenações Ao fim da leitura, o ministro Joaquim Barbosa votou pela condenação de Marcos Valério, Ramon Hollerbach, Cristiano Paz, Rogério Tolentino, Simone Vasconcelos, Geiza Dias, Kátia Rabello, José Roberto Salgado e Vinícius Samarane pelo crime descrito no artigo 1º, incisos V, VI e VII da Lei 9.613, na redação anterior à Lei 12.683/2012, “praticado 46 vezes em continuidade… [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 9:07 am
Silverman of Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick, and Peter J. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 2:30 am by Robert Tanha
Part VIII of the Act does not apply to,(a) a person employed as a firefighter as defined in section 1 of the Fire Protection and Prevention Act, 1997;(b) a person whose work is supervisory or managerial in character and who may perform non-supervisory or non-managerial tasks on an irregular or exceptional basis;(c) a person employed as a fishing or hunting guide;(d) a person employed,(i) as a landscape gardener, or(ii) to install and maintain swimming pools;(e) a person whose employment is directly… [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 11:31 am by admin
One example, the appellate decision in Rosen v. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 7:21 pm
J. 875 (2007), which is generally about KSR v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:38 am by PJ Blount
(2) PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM- Section 40122 of title 49, United States Code, is amended– (A) by redesignating subsection (j) as subsection (k); and (B) by inserting after subsection (i) the following: `(j) Transportation Security Administration- Notwithstanding any other provision of this section (including subsection (g)(2)(C)), this section shall be subject to section 7103(a)(2)(vi) and (3)(I) of title 5, United States… [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 2:11 am
It simply provides for the application of the J&K law (Para 55) There is no “lacuna” in the Act therefore not applying to non-Convention awards. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 10:34 am
  Commitee Members: Democrats   Chairman Daniel K. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 11:01 am by James Yang
   But under 37 CFR 1.530(j), (k), claims amended during reexamination cannot issue as a patent if the scope of the claims have changed during reexamination and the patent has expired. [read post]