Search for: "MATTER OF T L S"
Results 1561 - 1580
of 9,091
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
Landmark Polish Supreme Court ruling on EU trade mark: acquiescence vs national rules of limitation?
1 Jul 2021, 8:44 am
On 18 May 2021, the Polish Supreme Court issued a much awaited ruling to resolve doubts concerning the national limitation period of non-pecuniary claims in trademark matters. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 3:19 pm
See Baude, Rethinking the Federal Eminent Domain Power, 122 Yale L. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 4:00 am
L’arrêt de la Cour suprême le plus récent sur cette question est l’affaire Québec (Commission des droits de la personne et des droits de la jeunesse) c. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 2:47 am
In other words, there were two grounds for sustaining the opposition, not three Text Copyright John L. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 8:17 am
” Doesn’t matter, the court found that , the court found that any assignment of any specific patent claims will typically include an implied warranty of validity. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 11:50 pm
The GC upheld again the Board of Appeal (BOA)’s earlier decision even though, this time, it took into consideration the arguments on the alleged weak character of the earlier mark. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 9:01 pm
Food Systems Summit work Lawrence Haddad, chair of Action Track 1 for the UN Food Systems Summit, said he was shocked there wasn’t an SDG indicator for food safety but glad WHO and FAO are working on it. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 9:45 am
"[10] The Court reasoned, [T]he case boils down to whether the department's manner of gaining control of the federal funds involves "other legal process," as the statute uses that term. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 6:08 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
26 Jun 2021, 11:15 am
(g) Failure to protect the child from conditions within his environment injurious to the child’s welfare. [read post]
26 Jun 2021, 7:52 am
Lasker,“Defending Daubert: It’s Time to Amend Federal Rule of Evidence 702,” 57 William & Mary L. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 7:18 am
L. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 1:58 pm
But the saga doesn’t end there! [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 10:09 am
L. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 9:19 am
L. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 8:47 am
Env't L. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 10:21 am
L. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 4:00 am
Hamel, 2021 QCCDPHA 25 (CanLII) [139] Il convient de noter que l’exemption accordée aux termes de l’article 56 Loi réglementant certaines drogues et autres substances[56] ne s’applique pas de même que l’article 36 du Règlement sur les stupéfiants[57] qui concerne les préparations à faible dose de codéine. [140] Ainsi, à titre de pharmacienne, l’intimée est… [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 8:11 am
District Judge Louis L. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 7:27 am
However, the indispensability of one’s own intervention is not the only criterion to consider. [read post]
