Search for: "Mines v. State" Results 1561 - 1580 of 3,507
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2017, 11:07 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
Since Adani and Tata had long term fuel supply agreements from coal mines in Indonesia at fixed/ predictable prices, there was no need to factor in price escalation.Accordingly the lowest tariff was arrived at and power producers began to sell power at the said tariff after executing Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs) with the state power procurers. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 11:07 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
Since Adani and Tata had long term fuel supply agreements from coal mines in Indonesia at fixed/ predictable prices, there was no need to factor in price escalation.Accordingly the lowest tariff was arrived at and power producers began to sell power at the said tariff after executing Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs) with the state power procurers. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 2:16 am by Kevin LaCroix
In yet another U.S. securities class action lawsuit involving a non-U.S. company and a corruption investigation in the company’s home country, on March 19, 2015 a shareholder of Chemical & Mining Company of Chile, Inc. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 1:56 pm by Lyle Denniston
EPA and two companion cases (National Mining Association v. [read post]
30 Jul 2011, 3:57 pm
Hence, as a means of preventing the escape of slaves, the change in the law was made.The case is United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 7:34 am by John Elwood
Yesterday the Supreme Court granted petitioners' motion to dismiss the writ of certiorari pursuant to Rule 46 in the spellcheck-challenging Pottawattamie County v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 6:40 pm by Rick Pildes
Put another way, this is an effort by the Obama administration to show it does not need to put people into a regime of long-term military detention in order to ensure that alleged terrorists are adequately mined for whatever intelligence value they might have. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 5:01 am
Public Service Commission, is a “a substantial interest to be achieved by restrictions on commercial speech,” 447 U.S. 557, 564 (1980), we’re certain that mining the government’s briefs in prior First Amendment litigation such as United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm by Tom Goldstein
  Both served as Assistant United States Attorneys and as high-level aides to Attorneys General. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 9:30 pm
Brief amicus curiae of United States (recommending holding of petition pending decision in MetLife v. [read post]