Search for: "Murphy v. State"
Results 1561 - 1580
of 2,100
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2012, 8:14 pm
The court reconciled two premises that seem to be at odds: (1) that the "premium pay" an employer owes for rest period violations is a "wage" (as the Court had previously held in Murphy v. [read post]
16 Sep 2007, 10:18 am
Murphy, 412 U.S. 291, 295 (1973); Schmerber v. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 6:13 am
Murphy, Constitutional Democracy (2006)Keith E. [read post]
26 Jul 2004, 2:01 pm
See Murphy v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 1:26 pm
" (Olmstead v. [read post]
21 Aug 2016, 3:30 pm
See Murphy v. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 1:02 am
On Appeal to the United States Supreme Court, Steele v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 4:11 pm
" That argument was rooted in the California Supreme Court's 2007 decision in Murphy v. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 10:19 am
” The court accepted these arguments at this stage (citing, inter alia, Murphy v. [read post]
10 Mar 2013, 6:35 am
He compares the case to US v. [read post]
16 Nov 2021, 5:30 am
Two weeks ago, a federal district court in Texas decided Bear Creek Bible Church v. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 7:20 am
This is because, like all keen IP bloggers, they are in a state of perpetual catch-up: the moment we take time off to read a piece of news, give it some thought and then write it up, something else suddenly crops up while we're not looking. [read post]
27 Sep 2014, 10:06 am
The common law, as it developed in the United States from the early 19th century, was hospitable to apportionments that avoided “entire” or “joint and several” liability. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 8:09 am
Murphy’s work on Admin. [read post]
24 Sep 2012, 5:00 am
Mar. 1, 2012), and in New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC d/b/a AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 3:22 am
Crowley was referring to the salaries of Michael V. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 6:30 am
As Justice Murphy wrote in the 1946 case of Thornhill v. [read post]
10 Oct 2012, 5:01 am
In Murphy et al v. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 6:55 am
Fox v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 4:11 am
” Sean Murphy and Jessica Gresko of the Associated Press report that the decision “means that Oklahoma prosecutors lack the authority to pursue criminal cases against American Indian defendants in parts of Oklahoma that include most of Tulsa, the state’s second-largest city. [read post]
