Search for: "People v. Quick"
Results 1561 - 1580
of 2,541
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Mar 2013, 10:34 pm
National Basketball Assoc. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2013, 6:23 pm
Last week the Superior Court of Pennsylvania affirmed a jury award of $443,418.09 in the case of Renna v. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 10:56 am
The Washington, DC gun control case, District of Columbia v. [read post]
17 Feb 2013, 12:32 am
Thus, in Baker v. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 4:39 am
Thus over the growth of a company, despite its "culture," regimentation is necessary to maintain order in processes.I did a quick search on WorkCompCentral for "NetFlix" to see if there were any Appeals Board Panel opinions or higher court decisions concerning the company. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 4:05 pm
They offer a solution that is quick, just and affordable and, most of all, they offer a remedy that is entirely independent of both government and the media”. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 2:58 pm
I’m very interested to hear more about this challenge if anybody knows details.The other challenge that springs to mind is based upon Burnip v Birmingham CC, Trengove v Walsall MBC, and Gorry v Wiltshire C [2012] EWCA Civ 629 (Our report here). [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 2:58 pm
I’m very interested to hear more about this challenge if anybody knows details.The other challenge that springs to mind is based upon Burnip v Birmingham CC, Trengove v Walsall MBC, and Gorry v Wiltshire C [2012] EWCA Civ 629 (Our report here). [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 7:12 am
Federal form 1040-V, Payment Voucher (downloads as a pdf). [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 11:31 am
By Amy Clarise AshworthState v. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 1:46 pm
One law passed two years ago in Texas, referred to by some as the “loser pays” law, may have a significant impact on people’s ability to seek relief for injuries in state and federal court, both by allowing quick dismissal of purportedly “frivolous” lawsuits and by putting plaintiffs at risk of hefty attorney’s fee judgments. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 3:01 pm
The case in question is SAS Institute Inc v World Programming Ltd [2013] EWHC 69 (Ch), decided last Friday by Mr Justice Arnold, on the return of that case from its "holiday" in Luxembourg. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 10:32 am
It is those words that were adopted by the people. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 10:36 am
A quick trip through its website (http://www.us.hilti.com) reveals tools most people wouldn’t have in their home workshops, such as 1100-watt demolition hammers, gas-powered fasteners, and cordless drywall screwers. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 10:56 am
The Supreme Court recently addressed this very issue in Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 7:56 am
One, I sat down for an interview with Dan Alban, the lead attorney in Loving et al v. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 6:32 am
Commonwealth v. [read post]
19 Jan 2013, 9:37 am
The Policy, further, states that the focus is on “both people for science and science for people”. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 10:40 am
” County of Sacramento v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 9:16 am
* Shrader v. [read post]
